HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Scientific American has n... » Reply #28

Response to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Wed Sep 16, 2020, 10:04 AM

28. I saw the LBN yesterday and was really surprised

because I don't recall ever seeing their name involved in politics.

There are so many hundreds of "major" scientific journals out there now, with even more online-only. SA used to be the most well known - the gold standard - and one of the old stalwarts, which until now, seemed to have faded in the background.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 28 replies Author Time Post
fleur-de-lisa Sep 15 OP
Spazito Sep 15 #1
cayugafalls Sep 15 #2
calimary Sep 15 #3
Upthevibe Sep 15 #4
Sympthsical Sep 15 #5
llmart Sep 15 #6
DFW Sep 15 #13
cp Sep 15 #7
JDC Sep 15 #8
Javaman Sep 15 #9
rkleinberger Sep 15 #10
Jim__ Sep 15 #11
fleur-de-lisa Sep 15 #12
demmiblue Sep 15 #14
malaise Sep 15 #15
LanternWaste Sep 15 #16
Cha Sep 15 #17
warmfeet Sep 15 #18
tandem5 Sep 15 #19
Buckeye_Democrat Sep 15 #20
3catwoman3 Sep 15 #24
bdamomma Sep 15 #21
MyMission Sep 15 #22
IronLionZion Sep 15 #23
TigressDem Sep 15 #25
burrowowl Sep 16 #26
Sherman A1 Sep 16 #27
LineNew Reply I saw the LBN yesterday and was really surprised
BumRushDaShow Sep 16 #28
Please login to view edit histories.