Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sad sally

(2,627 posts)
57. From 2003...then forward eight years later to 2011
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 11:28 PM
Jan 2012

Sep26-03

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Most residents of Baghdad say that ousting Saddam Hussein was worth the hardships they've endured since then, says a Gallup poll that shows they are divided on whether the country is worse off or better off than before the U.S. invasion.

Two-thirds, 67 percent, say they think that Iraq will be in better condition five years from now than it was before the U.S.-led invasion. Only 8 percent say they think it will be worse off.

But they're not convinced that Iraq is better off now - 47 percent said the country is worse off than before the invasion and 33 percent said it is better off.

...

The survey found that 62 percent think ousting Saddam was worth the hardships they have endured since the invasion. In the five months since coalition forces defeated Saddam and his armies, Iraq has faced continuing violence, electrical outages, job shortages and civil unrest.

http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAQ_POLL?SITE=PAPIT&SECTION=HOME http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-6387.html?du

then from September 6, 2011 (antiwar.com, the website DU bans links from):

The latest is a piece on Iraqis’ PTSD: present-traumatic stress disorder. They can’t leave their homes without worrying they won’t come back. Constant bombings and shootings — some 20 a day on average in the country — maintain civilians in a state of chronic terror. Our Margaret Griffis documents several to dozens of Iraqis killed and wounded every day in the country’s low rumble of violence — and these are just the ones that make it into the papers. The controversy for AP reporter Lara Jakes is that Iraq is indeed worse, by far, than it was under the last years of the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not to mention the hideous birth defects. Sabriel Jan 2012 #1
The halflife of Depleted Uranium is 400,000 years if I recall correctly. Gregorian Jan 2012 #5
Off by orders of magnitude. Igel Jan 2012 #12
That's right. It's 4 billion years. Gregorian Jan 2012 #14
So you don't mind if we store some in your closet? ret5hd Jan 2012 #58
Radioactivity is not the problem with DU. ManiacJoe Jan 2012 #13
We're only talking about ingestion. You're right. We're all correct. Gregorian Jan 2012 #15
I'm unfamiliar with this issue in Iraq. What is the source of depleted uranium in Iraq? n/t wakemewhenitsover Jan 2012 #47
Armor piercing munition. Gregorian Jan 2012 #48
Jeez. ty for the info. wakemewhenitsover Jan 2012 #52
Exactly Major Nikon Jan 2012 #59
Indeed, Ma'am: A Cock-Up Of Monumental Proportion The Magistrate Jan 2012 #2
The bigger problem is that America doesn't care. Pacafishmate Jan 2012 #3
Yes, sadly IMO that is so true. For many, the war was really out of RKP5637 Jan 2012 #8
Media AWOL in exposing Iraq War’s years of ineptitude sad sally Jan 2012 #40
Thanks, excellent article. As usual, the media fails this country miserably. RKP5637 Jan 2012 #42
+1 Solly Mack Jan 2012 #31
Glad Juan Cole is welcome at DU again. Excellent piece illustrating just how horrific... joshcryer Jan 2012 #4
K&R....God will punish us....n/t unkachuck Jan 2012 #6
A truly shameful chapter in our American history. Old and In the Way Jan 2012 #7
The Bagdad Burning Blog still exists tabatha Jan 2012 #9
and NO ONE will be held accountable Skittles Jan 2012 #10
I think about that everyday and I do mean every single day. That they got away with it. Solly Mack Jan 2012 #32
I know, I do as well Tsiyu Jan 2012 #55
meaning it can, and will, happen again Skittles Jan 2012 #63
Yep. What's to stop them? Certainly not fear of prosecution. Solly Mack Jan 2012 #66
K&R!! G_j Jan 2012 #11
K&R nt) T S Justly Jan 2012 #16
"until we Americans take responsibility for the harm we do others with our perpetual wars" WE? AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #17
Useful stats fujiyama Jan 2012 #18
People really ought to stop using the term 'perpetual wars'. It is historically naive stevenleser Jan 2012 #19
When will the "War on Terror" be over? Nostradammit Jan 2012 #20
Long before the word perpetual is appropriate. nt stevenleser Jan 2012 #21
And when will that be? Nostradammit Jan 2012 #22
See post 21. (note, this will be my response going forward) nt stevenleser Jan 2012 #23
So you can't tell me when the "War on Terror" will be over? Nostradammit Jan 2012 #24
You're the one with the name Nostradammit. You tell me. P.S., see post #21 stevenleser Jan 2012 #25
It's perpetual. By design. Nostradammit Jan 2012 #30
Mighty clever. You've got a PNAC for this. Maven Jan 2012 #49
The War on Terror will be over... bvar22 Jan 2012 #37
We are referring to the "Perpetual State of WAR". bvar22 Jan 2012 #36
the death toll must be much higher barbtries Jan 2012 #26
The Lancet estimated excess deaths to be a million or so eridani Jan 2012 #27
all victims of the violence barbtries Jan 2012 #29
And THAT figure does NOT include the 1/2 MILLION children killed by the "sanctions" .... bvar22 Jan 2012 #38
This infamous video was well known in the ME cpwm17 Jan 2012 #65
Here's a site that's been documenting the death in Iraq, and no in my lifetime I don't expect sad sally Jan 2012 #39
it says 114,000 + barbtries Jan 2012 #50
War wasn't my idea. Octafish Jan 2012 #28
How right you are - ask these corporations how well they've done with war sad sally Jan 2012 #41
And I suppose they received a tax break on top those outrages profits.... midnight Jan 2012 #60
Agreed. MH1 Jan 2012 #33
You're right, it was intended to be upbeat for the military, and it's now part of the President's sad sally Jan 2012 #43
It is/was an invasion/conquest/occupation conducted solely to increase the wealth and Zorra Jan 2012 #34
This needs to be read and understood Athame Jan 2012 #35
If we are true to our creed The Wizard Jan 2012 #44
From President Obama's speech to Fort Bragg troops: sad sally Jan 2012 #45
And it won't accurately be covered in our kids school history books either NNN0LHI Jan 2012 #46
It's all so damn sad... Texasgal Jan 2012 #51
Du rec. Nt xchrom Jan 2012 #53
Umm.. It was indeed an extraordinary achievement.. Fumesucker Jan 2012 #54
I think the only thing good that came from all of it is that Saddam Hussein is gone. DCBob Jan 2012 #56
From 2003...then forward eight years later to 2011 sad sally Jan 2012 #57
The real disaster is coming... a regional ME war followed by WW3. roamer65 Jan 2012 #61
Just wait til the government falls. MilesColtrane Jan 2012 #62
A 3 way civil war may erupt,ala Lebanon but magnitudes bigger. Swede Jan 2012 #64
DU Iraq deconstruct911 Jan 2012 #67
Some of us do Bobby S Jan 2012 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»America has no idea of wh...»Reply #57