I liken using Facebook to being a scab or crossing a picket line.there is a BOYCOTT.

[Blue_true]

108. I believe I was on one of those juries.

The post that I saw alerted on, I chose to leave up, because it wasn’t clear that the poster that was alerted on broke the rule that was identified. My guess is the other two juries saw the same, so either the poster is skilled at masking intentions, or the alert was not strong enough to have a jury take the post down. I normally don’t post about jury service, but since you challenged the motives of me and 17 other jurors, perhaps unintentionally, I felt a need to weigh in. Discussions about Facebook are always fraught with divisions, some solid DUERS love the platform, others despise it (I am in the latter camp). What I saw as a juror were referenced to other methods other than Facebook and claims about how much time using one of them would take versus Facebook, then a person makes a one or two sentence reply that got alerted on, I read all posts and expanded them to view the full sequence of comments, and decided that the post should stay, as apparently the majority on my jury and the two others for two other alerts did.