Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How would you go about taxing wealth? [View all]zipplewrath
(16,698 posts)9. Could even tax wealth growth
Every year one has to establish their "net worth". Each year, one is taxed on the growth of that wealth If you are getting poorer, no tax. If you are getting richer, there's a tax.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Did lowering cg taxes encourage and increase investing, which helped the stock market?
Honeycombe8
Sep 2012
#20
Just 2% of household net worth, less a $100K per household deduction = $1 trillion tax rev.
reformist2
Sep 2012
#5
If you lose money on an investment you are allowed to apply that loss to future gains
True Earthling
Sep 2012
#118
A) NO ONE invests to create jobs. They invest to create income FOR THEMSELVES.
lumberjack_jeff
Sep 2012
#104
The only relevant wealth for the purpose of this argument is the income producing kind
lumberjack_jeff
Sep 2012
#122
A flat tax on wealth is actually more progressive than a progressive income tax - and simpler.
reformist2
Sep 2012
#13
A person worth $1 billion pays peanuts in income taxes, but would pay $20 million a year..
reformist2
Sep 2012
#97
Not punitive, essential to a healthy national economy. Vast individual/familial wealth
Egalitarian Thug
Sep 2012
#26
So taxation is now a crime? Are you sure you're in the right place? n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Sep 2012
#35
Ah, my bad. I'm/we're talking about inheritance tax and I never made that clear.
Egalitarian Thug
Sep 2012
#63
I wouldn't either. Sometimes my brain works faster than my fingers can and I tend to skip
Egalitarian Thug
Sep 2012
#93
I believe every state taxes ownership of registered motor vehicles and boats
slackmaster
Sep 2012
#96
Tax INCOME from all sources. The greater the income bracket, the higher the rate.
kestrel91316
Sep 2012
#40
Other than inheritance and property tax you can't really tax "wealth" but we should
bamacrat
Sep 2012
#52
yup this i would vote against. you do realise that people have interactions everyday
loli phabay
Sep 2012
#80
Yeah. Build a wall around the country and prohibit doing business w/anyone outside the border.
cherokeeprogressive
Sep 2012
#84
So how does my company, which employs nothing but American Citizens, do business outside
cherokeeprogressive
Sep 2012
#107
And if you had a child who was traveling outside of the country, and had a problem?
MiniMe
Sep 2012
#91
Why? How would you define "wealthy?" Would it be indexed annually for inflation?
slackmaster
Sep 2012
#82
Do you believe the amount of money that can exist is finite? That the economy is a zero-sum game?
slackmaster
Sep 2012
#95
Does the Walton family or the Pritzkers or whoever having a lot of money make you poor?
slackmaster
Sep 2012
#111
That is nonsense. There are economies in this world in which there is no debt at all,
slackmaster
Sep 2012
#113
Fine. Tax 85% of the dividends/interest/gains that this sacred wealth throws off. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Sep 2012
#105
Exactly! What we should have is a government that determines what people NEED
hughee99
Sep 2012
#127
Would you accept wealth as payment of the wealth tax? Or would you require cash?
Egalitariat
Sep 2012
#125