Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(33,643 posts)

14. Given the way Democrats handle subpoenas being ignored and such ...

Fri Sep 18, 2020, 11:13 PM

Sep 2020

I'm sure the threat of some sharply worded letters will have MM up into the wee hours tossing and turning.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It needs to be made crystal clear... [View all] JHB Sep 2020 OP

I'm not very intelligent on Constitutional matters.... idziak4ever1234 Sep 2020 #1

The Constitution doesn't say anything about the # of SCOTUS justices. mr_lebowski Sep 2020 #4

It's not in direct opposition ... mr_lebowski Sep 2020 #2

If it was horseshit ... and it most certainly was ... mr_lebowski Sep 2020 #8

Given the way Democrats handle subpoenas being ignored and such ... mr_lebowski Sep 2020 #14

We don't have to claim it's valid-- lastlib Sep 2020 #17

Mitch has already said the situations are completely different. PTWB Sep 2020 #6

Who gives an eff what he's said? He's a shellful of turtle piss. JHB Sep 2020 #7

of course he will MFM008 Sep 2020 #9

That's not what he's saying now. PTWB Sep 2020 #11

I believe ya ... (nt) mr_lebowski Sep 2020 #12

I said a couple of years ago Meowmee Sep 2020 #16

Years ago, there was a proposal..... lastlib Sep 2020 #18