Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(59,502 posts)
22. I'm not sure there are many who will be harmed by voting - especially if the nominee, though
Sat Sep 19, 2020, 02:12 PM
Sep 2020

conservative, has no ethical baggage.

They are in red or at best, purple states. Many people were likely to vote for them to get conservative judges, even if they had problems with them otherwise. Collins, likely loses election whether she votes yes or no. Gardner is also in a purple state, but it might be more important to hold onto his base than be concerned with the middle, who are tough to predict. In the red states, it might even help the Republicans.

It stinks that they stole the 2016 seat, but they did and the short McConnell explanation is essentially, they did it because they could because they held the Senate. Now, because they eliminated the filibuster, they have the power to win this vote. They will argue that they are doing their Constitutional duty of advise and consent --- ignoring they refused to do that same duty for a year in 2016. However, in a highly partisan environment, they essentially are not concerned with looking consistent. In fact, they will likely argue that they are following their values.

Goody. LakeArenal Sep 2020 #1
I disagree mcar Sep 2020 #2
Moscow Mitch actually does work for Vlad Putin Eliot Rosewater Sep 2020 #3
Moscow Mitch likely won't hold a vote until after the election ... Statistical Sep 2020 #4
That makes sense but... kentuck Sep 2020 #6
It is Moscow Mitch. A win is a win. They don't care about anything else. Statistical Sep 2020 #7
There are several more Repubs up for election this time around. kentuck Sep 2020 #9
It would be after the election. They have already won or lost by the time the vote happens. Statistical Sep 2020 #11
You are correct that Repubs take advantage of the moment... kentuck Sep 2020 #12
Why? Of everyone they have literally nothing to lose. Statistical Sep 2020 #14
After they are defeated, they do not have the legitimacy to vote for SC Justice. kentuck Sep 2020 #15
This story has 2 parts. Part 1 is pre-election and part 2 is post election. OrlandoDem2 Sep 2020 #5
Exactly. The lame duck session is the big worry for me. roamer65 Sep 2020 #19
I agree, but unfortunately, this gives their cretins more motivation to go vote ooky Sep 2020 #8
I am not sure of that? kentuck Sep 2020 #10
You could be right. I certainly hope you are. ooky Sep 2020 #13
You think Roe v. Wade divides Republicans? SMC22307 Sep 2020 #16
I think most polls indicate that "anti-choice" is a losing issue for Republicans. kentuck Sep 2020 #17
If they are pro-choice, why in the world would they PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2020 #21
Pro-chice does not mean they are pro-abortion. kentuck Sep 2020 #24
No one is pro-abortion. PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2020 #25
They won't come out and say it. They're sneaky. They'll speak in code... SMC22307 Sep 2020 #23
Gardner from CO votes on a Dump nominee and he's definite toast. roamer65 Sep 2020 #18
He is already a dead man walking. tritsofme Sep 2020 #20
I'm not sure there are many who will be harmed by voting - especially if the nominee, though karynnj Sep 2020 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»McConnell will not place ...»Reply #22