Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This is bothering me [View all]pat_k
(12,827 posts)4. And that's a principle we want to now follow? Even though clearly wrong with Garland?
So, Feb 2024, last year of Biden's term, a justices passes / retires. Biden shouldn't be the one to nominate someone to fill the seat?
For our own sakes, and the sake of principle, I think we need to be clearer about where we stand on this. Otherwise, we'll be the hypocrites. Perhaps no vacancy after the conventions to be filled until after inauguration day.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There's a better than average possibility that Trump WON'T be re-elected as well
Proud Liberal Dem
Sep 2020
#39
we are better than them. But let's be prepared to lose because the playing field is not even
AlexSFCA
Sep 2020
#13
They did us dirty in 2016 by creating the "principle" in the first place and blocking Garland.
Proud Liberal Dem
Sep 2020
#40
And that's a principle we want to now follow? Even though clearly wrong with Garland?
pat_k
Sep 2020
#4
We are saying: apply the same principle you applied last time. Nothing has changed.
Jim__
Sep 2020
#10
We will never fix this...as soon as the GOP has the Senate, they would block our judges. They
Demsrule86
Sep 2020
#27
I will say this. No judges will be approved unless the party in the White House has the Senate.
Demsrule86
Sep 2020
#24
You can't make agreements with liars and Republicans are liars thus no Senate no judges at
Demsrule86
Sep 2020
#25
No, and Schumer says that nothing is off the table...code for end filibuster and
Demsrule86
Sep 2020
#35
No, our nominee was stolen... And Mitch said it was because it was too close to an election.
Demsrule86
Sep 2020
#21
To be blunt, it doesn't bother me whatsoever. I get your point, but.....nope.
dameatball
Sep 2020
#33
