Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(141,926 posts)

1. This was not a 'legal precedent,'

Sat Sep 19, 2020, 03:31 PM

Sep 2020

but a 'convenient' ruse; there is no LEGAL basis requiring this non-precedent to be followed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can Democrats file a lawsuit due to precedents being binding? [View all] Drunken Irishman Sep 2020 OP

This was not a 'legal precedent,' elleng Sep 2020 #1

No. But they can stack the courts after they win jorgevlorgan Sep 2020 #2