Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Scruffy1

(3,252 posts)
16. The "court packing" plan was simple politics.
Sat Sep 19, 2020, 05:31 PM
Sep 2020

It was never a serious plan and all the garbage that has become accepted by the public is just plain bad history. FDR never even talked to the House Leader about it. It was just his way of sending a message of what could happen if the Supremes kept on with their BS. They had already become a bad joke with their Lochner era BS. It worked. By 1940 the Supreme egomaniacs had reversed themselves on most of the important issues of the day such as child labor laws and working hours
Roosevelt was a master politician and gradually the bunch of old white guys who lived in a bubble came to realize how out of step they were and started thinking about their legacy. I think it was a stroke of genius.

I would love to see the Court expanded to 13. aquamarina Sep 2020 #1
that's logical dweller Sep 2020 #2
Makes sense. And then... paleotn Sep 2020 #10
I agree. I've thought this for a long time. Lonestarblue Sep 2020 #27
I completely agree. aquamarina Sep 2020 #31
I think we should forget that BeyondGeography Sep 2020 #3
I respectfully disagree. Biden will be riding a huge Blue Wave Tommymac Sep 2020 #6
How about starting with Biden's DE buddy Chris Coons BeyondGeography Sep 2020 #8
yes Gore1FL Sep 2020 #9
Biden is on the record as opposed to packing the court BeyondGeography Sep 2020 #13
They also oppose the GOP rat-fucking the courts, I suspect. Gore1FL Sep 2020 #18
My answer is he probably sees this as a waste of time to begin with BeyondGeography Sep 2020 #19
You asked DU, not Biden. nt Gore1FL Sep 2020 #21
If the SC strikes down Roe v Wade, gay marriage, Mr.Bill Sep 2020 #11
So we've los the Supreme Court for 20 years? RhodeIslandOne Sep 2020 #26
Hate to break it to you BeyondGeography Sep 2020 #30
Biden doesn't have to do this all by himself. LiberalFighter Sep 2020 #33
There's another, similar rationale kurtcagle Sep 2020 #4
That really cuts to the chase bucolic_frolic Sep 2020 #5
Possibly, but we have an election to win first. ooky Sep 2020 #7
yep, and we should but RBG is on record saying she is against packing the court. I think we should yaesu Sep 2020 #12
We wouldn't be packing the Court, we'd be unpacking the Court. bucolic_frolic Sep 2020 #22
"a justified gesture of constitutional restoration, not usurpation" liberalla Sep 2020 #14
Nope. I want 15 justices Miguelito Loveless Sep 2020 #15
The "court packing" plan was simple politics. Scruffy1 Sep 2020 #16
Even More OhioTim Sep 2020 #17
. lastlib Sep 2020 #24
And to the hand-wringers who say this politicizes the Court, well it already IS politicized. SunSeeker Sep 2020 #20
Raise the number to 21 by adding 12 more justices. Quemado Sep 2020 #23
Until even later when the GOP can get back control of House/Senate + Presidency andym Sep 2020 #25
Turnabout Nasruddin Sep 2020 #28
great idea! RicROC Sep 2020 #36
If Moscow Mitch pulls this shit, with his decidedly unconservative contempt for the Constitution... NNadir Sep 2020 #29
My question is, if we add justices, where does it end? CaptainTruth Sep 2020 #32
They'll do it JGug1 Sep 2020 #38
6 Justices in 1790 when population was just under 4 million. nt LiberalFighter Sep 2020 #34
Supreme Court JGug1 Sep 2020 #35
If Trump gets his replacement for RBG in time wnylib Sep 2020 #37
A lot of comments here stating Biden isn't for it Alpeduez21 Sep 2020 #39
Or reduce it to 7 Captain Zero Sep 2020 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In the battle over the US...»Reply #16