General Discussion

StClone

(11,869 posts)

33. God Awful

Fri Sep 25, 2020, 09:40 PM

Sep 2020

What makes her Justice for life material? Really! Amy's nomination, and likely confirmation, is a mockery, right up there with Clarence Thomas (and almost Bork). What makes them "suitable" is complicity to do the biding of the elites cloaked in "Her beautiful Religious convictions." She is Judicial trash and an extremism. Some credentials, aye?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Amy Coney Barrett hid her membership in the religious group that inspired hit TV show The Handmaid's [View all] Klaralven Sep 2020 OP

All the Dem Senators should wear RED into hearings. Funtatlaguy Sep 2020 #1

That would be EPIC Rice4VP Sep 2020 #13

. Klaralven Sep 2020 #14

Remind me again why Shrub's nominee, Harriet Miers, was turned away by no_hypocrisy Sep 2020 #2

Because back then there were a few decent Republicans left. totodeinhere Sep 2020 #5

Very different level of qualification FBaggins Sep 2020 #25

Other than both being women, their nominations have little in common. tritsofme Sep 2020 #31

By what stretch of logic Cirque du So-What Sep 2020 #3

Clearly, her flying rabbit Sep 2020 #7

Then her HUSBAND needs to testify about HIS principles and beliefs. blm Sep 2020 #17

No. flying rabbit Sep 2020 #19

The woman are referred to as handmaids Colleen8406 Sep 2020 #37

Someone here suggested having her husband testify. Volaris Sep 2020 #41

It won't make any difference. The Republicans will ram her through no matter what. totodeinhere Sep 2020 #4

She'll have to pray before she is rammed. Klaralven Sep 2020 #6

What you said StClone Sep 2020 #23

Hopefully her husband will speak for her at these hearings. We need to hear from her boss. TeamPooka Sep 2020 #8

Here is a thought. TruckFump Sep 2020 #9

The House could impeach her or any judge and they wouldn't even need a reason. totodeinhere Sep 2020 #10

True. TruckFump Sep 2020 #11

Hi I am Amy an Extremist Religious whack Job and MY Right wing views are even zealous StClone Sep 2020 #24

Scary. TruckFump Sep 2020 #27

God Awful StClone Sep 2020 #33

You said it perfectly IMO. TruckFump Sep 2020 #35

They would have to show evidence of high crimes or misdemeanors, The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2020 #12

The senate would still have to vote to convict her with 67 votes. PTWB Sep 2020 #18

But, the exercise could get us past Nov 3 or later. TruckFump Sep 2020 #20

Moscow Mitch would refuse witnesses and dismiss it instantly. /nt radius777 Sep 2020 #45

A better question is, why did she feel the need to do that to begin with? Volaris Sep 2020 #42

Will she have to check with her husband on the cases she rules on? kimbutgar Sep 2020 #15

"Religious group"? It's a blasted cult. Bunch of looney toons. nt Cognitive_Resonance Sep 2020 #16

I tried watching that show. It was just too dark. Yavin4 Sep 2020 #21

It bdamomma Sep 2020 #29

Daily Mail is not reliable alp227 Sep 2020 #22

Thanks! I like to think that Dems represent critical thinking and a ... LAS14 Sep 2020 #36

But she's a member of a conservative, authoritarian, hierarchical, and patriarchal cult Klaralven Sep 2020 #39

Yes, exactly right. SophieJean Sep 2020 #40

The Vox article is hardly representative of the "left." SophieJean Sep 2020 #43

Agree. The 'debunking' articles use trivia to arrive at a bothsiderist conclusion. radius777 Sep 2020 #46

I sure wish Al Franken was still around. Mr. Evil Sep 2020 #26

Sounds like she must demur to her husband as a matter of contract bucolic_frolic Sep 2020 #28

How can she be a lawyer or a judge Master_Monstruwacan Sep 2020 #30

She's merely a tool. radius777 Sep 2020 #47

Sadly, 52 people get to make the decision for 300M+ of us COL Mustard Sep 2020 #32

Amy Looney Barrett area51 Sep 2020 #34

Someone pointed out that a "Coney" is a term used for a hot do. Amy Hot Dog Barrett soldierant Sep 2020 #38

Barrett supports a Murderous, Treasonous Psychopath.. Cha Sep 2020 #44

Um, okay. It was book first, published in 1985. intheflow Sep 2020 #48