Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(54,796 posts)
14. I agree, but we probably have too many institutionalist Dem Senators I fear to expand the SCOTUS
Sat Sep 26, 2020, 09:48 PM
Sep 2020

I am NOT saying that all of these will balk at it, but even if we flip 8 of the 11 most likely to flip seats (so have a 54-46 majority), if 5 of them say nope, then we are fucked. If 4 say no, then it will come down to Biden via his proxy vote, VP Harris.

here the the 20 most likely to say no, 2 already have said they oppose it (in bold), so if we take it back by just a 51-49 majority, it is already dead in the water unless those two are persuaded to change their mind

bear in mind, at least 5 or so have already said they will not even support getting rid of the filibuster


btw, if you see some on here who have said they WOULD support it (SCOTUS expansion), then please tell me and I amend the list


Arizona Kyrsten Sinema (I think she is likely to oppose it, she and Manchin are the two most conservative in the Dem Caucus)
California Dianne Feinstein
Colorado Michael Bennet
Delaware Tom Carper
Delaware Chris Coons
Illinois Dick Durbin
Maine Angus King
Michigan Debbie Stabenow
Michigan Gary Peters
Montana Jon Tester
Nevada Catherine Cortez Masto
Nevada Jacky Rosen
New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen
New Hampshire Maggie Hassan
Pennsylvania Bob Casey Jr.
Vermont Patrick Leahy
Virginia Mark Warner
Virginia Tim Kaine
West Virginia Joe Manchin
probably Hickenlooper and perhaps more of the new ones who win

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A decision on the ACA won't come until summer. Can filibuster rules be changed after term starts? OrlandoDem2 Sep 2020 #1
It doesn't matter. The filibuster must end immediately. Demsrule86 Sep 2020 #4
The case is being heard in November. StevieM Sep 2020 #13
I'm a year and a half away from Medicare Ohiogal Sep 2020 #2
Don't worry misanthrope Sep 2020 #7
Just nominating her has already had a profound impact. Just watch the early voting lines Boogiemack Sep 2020 #3
Her life will no longer be happy or private. The life of her kids and their futures not too good. katmondoo Sep 2020 #5
I seriously doubt her children lead very happy lives any way. hamsterjill Sep 2020 #17
a huge problem is, even if the Senate passed a MFA in say May, it will instantly be challenged in Celerity Sep 2020 #6
So it appears. Laelth Sep 2020 #9
I agree, but we probably have too many institutionalist Dem Senators I fear to expand the SCOTUS Celerity Sep 2020 #14
Let us hope that Amy Barrett's selection alters this calculus. Laelth Sep 2020 #15
I am more of a riding crop girl, lolol Celerity Sep 2020 #16
Sweet. n/t Laelth Sep 2020 #20
"Pro-Life!" moondust Sep 2020 #8
They'll pass that anr then it will be ruled unconstitutional amd that's that. There is no winning. GusFring Sep 2020 #10
The impact will only last a matter of months, if Congress has the spine to expand SCOTUS nt Fiendish Thingy Sep 2020 #11
First thing to happen in a new Democratic Senate. roamer65 Sep 2020 #12
Her life will no longer be happy or private. The life of her kids and their futures not too good. katmondoo Sep 2020 #18
+1000 smirkymonkey Sep 2020 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Confirmation of Amy Barre...»Reply #14