The Lincoln Project haven't said a single word about Amy Coney Barrett

[ehrnst]

259. So you can't name any other Nominee yesterday that they would have been talking about, can you?

But do keep trying to copy and paste previous posts that don't answer the question instead, because that totally makes you right, and is not frantic doubling down whatsoever.

Your argument is moot if you can't even suggest who they were talking about if not the SCOTUS nominee Amy Barette - but do try to claim the tweet had nothing to do with the ACA again. That was fun.



Even Autumn has given up trying to come to your rescue.

BTW - absence of evidence does not = evidence of absence. That's the fallacy that you've been trying to prop up the most in your refusal to admit you are wrong. If everything is soaking wet outside with water dripping off the trees into puddles when you go out to get the paper, you can insist "IT DIDN"T RAIN LAST NIGHT" until you are blue in the face, but if you can't explain the water that's everywhere otherwise, no one is going to take you seriously no matter how loudly and how many times you repeat "IT DIDN"T RAIN LAST NIGHT"