Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(4,380 posts)

4. Channel 4 has done some hard core reporting on this issue. Who said it was on is not important.

Mon Sep 28, 2020, 10:07 AM

Sep 2020

Edit: I didn't mean that to go to you but as a general comment to the op.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Probably Refers to Channel 4 in the UK. MineralMan Sep 2020 #1

The network is actually a public corporation, though funding by advertising muriel_volestrangler Sep 2020 #7

Channel 4 News 2 pm Eastern Time Doodley Sep 2020 #2

Well if Louise Mensch says so..... brooklynite Sep 2020 #3

Sources are important. Sources that have consistently been shown MineralMan Sep 2020 #5

I agree Leith Sep 2020 #12

Tainted sources engender suspicion. nt Codeine Sep 2020 #6

Here's another source ... eppur_se_muova Sep 2020 #8

What's her hit/miss ratio? Leith Sep 2020 #13

fuller report bigtree Sep 2020 #10

From Ch4 itself !! eppur_se_muova Sep 2020 #11

Tip of an iceberg? triron Sep 2020 #14