Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

AleksS

(1,719 posts)

13. So, will her husband accompany her to

Reply to Nevilledog (Original post)

Tue Sep 29, 2020, 12:34 PM

Sep 2020

the deliberation room to make sure he approves her SC decisions?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"...he accompanied her to gynecological appointments to ensure she couldn't get birth control." [View all] Nevilledog Sep 2020 OP

That Is What They Are Coming For Next, Ma'am The Magistrate Sep 2020 #1

Yup....disgusting this woman would ever sit on the high court. Nevilledog Sep 2020 #4

First overturn Roe v. Wade. Then overturn Griswold v. Connecticut. Klaralven Sep 2020 #6

You are 100% right on this.When anti-choicers started defining the IUD & The Pill as abortifacients Hekate Sep 2020 #24

Republicans want to PLAY ROUGH??? yuiyoshida Sep 2020 #30

Yes, I think some do want to make birth control illegal. Lonestarblue Sep 2020 #41

Oh, GAG ME. CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2020 #2

And by 2 minutes later, AP has taken the article down! hedda_foil Sep 2020 #3

Barrett tied to faith group ex-members say subjugates women Klaralven Sep 2020 #10

What I find sad and depressing about that story PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2020 #28

Pregnancy seems to be inevitable and determined by a woman's husband and Nature. no_hypocrisy Sep 2020 #5

"What do you call people who use the rhythm method? Parents." niyad Sep 2020 #11

And White people have no Rhythm Traildogbob Sep 2020 #27

we used to call it- vatican roulette. ihas2stinkyfeet Sep 2020 #43

So, she will be too cowed by her husband to make independent decisions. patricia92243 Sep 2020 #7

That alone would bar her from being a judge of anything in my opinion. If she would change her Maraya1969 Sep 2020 #19

"Days of the Theocracy" by Kristin Lems comes to mind immediately. niyad Sep 2020 #8

Not all theocracies prohibit contraception Klaralven Sep 2020 #12

Calls into question which Law she would uphold (among other things). BadgerKid Sep 2020 #9

So, will her husband accompany her to AleksS Sep 2020 #13

The Handmaid's Kooks Blue Owl Sep 2020 #14

. notinkansas Sep 2020 #15

See my post 16. sheshe2 Sep 2020 #17

The Tweet is incorrect. sheshe2 Sep 2020 #16

I read the tweet as talking about a woman in the cult, not ACB specifically. Nevilledog Sep 2020 #22

Well since the AP story was deleted I have assume that 'they' were referring to Barrett. sheshe2 Sep 2020 #26

Thanks for helping us stay Dems, who care about facts. nt LAS14 Sep 2020 #40

K&R Solly Mack Sep 2020 #18

WOW APNEWS: Why did you delete your article? MagickMuffin Sep 2020 #20

Here's a good link PatSeg Sep 2020 #33

When will they get around to banning D&C procedure? Boogiemack Sep 2020 #21

JFC!!! I think that actually fits here. ResistantAmerican17 Sep 2020 #23

Where Does The Pope Stand On People Of Praise? DallasNE Sep 2020 #25

OMG, I thought this was going to be about a daughter... Never thought this was about a wife!! liberalla Sep 2020 #29

Amy Coney Barret is exempt from such hardships; she's one of the Elite. haele Sep 2020 #31

So, she is.. Lithos Sep 2020 #38

Yes, just as Phyllis Sharkey was. haele Sep 2020 #42

And they call Antifa radical? Dark n Stormy Knight Sep 2020 #32

This makes me nauseous. And angry. SleeplessinSoCal Sep 2020 #34

Read up in the thread. cwydro Sep 2020 #35

Isn't it about her praise group though? SleeplessinSoCal Sep 2020 #36

Barret doesn't belong in the courts...she belongs in the house... moonseller66 Sep 2020 #37

Her husband needs to be the one being proposed for the Court Warpy Sep 2020 #39