Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
46. So I assume that you disagree with this.
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 11:17 PM
Sep 2012

"There was something missing from the release of a tape showing Mitt Romney pandering to fat cats in Boca Raton, Florida with these very inflammatory words: “There are 47 percent who are with him, (Obama) who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it. These are people who pay no income tax.” Romney said his job “is not to worry about those people.”

Hey, Mitt, why start with the 47 percent? Fully 100 percent of the nation’s 500 biggest corporations are dependent on various kinds of corporate welfare – subsidies, giveaways, bailouts, waivers, and other dazzling preferences – while many pay no tax at all on very substantial profits"
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/09/20-7

After all, it was written by Nader

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

it can't be said enough. fuck Ralph Nader. [View all] scheming daemons Sep 2012 OP
Why bother... WCGreen Sep 2012 #1
I agree fuck Nader gopiscrap Sep 2012 #2
to get graphic... a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #4
He prefers to criticize Democrats. WinkyDink Sep 2012 #3
Fuck you Ralph Nader...stronger message to follow. Freedomofspeech Sep 2012 #5
Blah blah blah. Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #6
Warcrimes don't matter tama Sep 2012 #7
What made you all decide to descend again today? Nt DevonRex Sep 2012 #18
Obama is winning, so romney's allies on the Naderite fringe are having a freak out. nt geek tragedy Sep 2012 #33
Nailed it... SidDithers Sep 2012 #42
All on the same day it seems. How remarkable is that DevonRex Sep 2012 #45
Delusion takes many forms nt tama Sep 2012 #50
Nailed that one..it is only a war crime if their guy does it. Talk about blind allegiance. AnOhioan Sep 2012 #9
Perhaps you'd be more comfortable elsewhere then. DevonRex Sep 2012 #17
"their guy?". This troll just outed himself. geek tragedy Sep 2012 #30
Oh boy. "Their guy" is Bush. Union Scribe Sep 2012 #51
"Their guy" is indeed any Republican President.... AnOhioan Sep 2012 #60
So..are you a mass murderer? my question makes just about as much sense AnOhioan Sep 2012 #61
Neither the LGBT group nor the feminists like "pearl clutching." DevonRex Sep 2012 #16
Concern noted. Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #22
Likewise, Assad/Qadaffi fanboy. nt geek tragedy Sep 2012 #29
Name one country either has murdered other citizens in? Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #35
No, you only cheer for dictators murdering their own people. nt geek tragedy Sep 2012 #38
It is called civil war and it sucks. Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #39
Obama was democratically elected. Your heroes were never elected and geek tragedy Sep 2012 #41
And yet our elected official has no qualms about being friends with "those" people. Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #43
Scotland. bluedigger Sep 2012 #47
Haha. You called me an Internet nobody. YOU! DevonRex Sep 2012 #48
I wonder what it takes to be an internet somebody? renie408 Sep 2012 #56
And if Assad or Qadaffi did something 100 times worse, you'd defend them. geek tragedy Sep 2012 #28
They kill people in other countries? Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #34
No, they only massacre their own citizens--which is okay with those geek tragedy Sep 2012 #37
I wrote him off years ago Skittles Sep 2012 #8
The war criminal is Nader. bluestate10 Sep 2012 #10
So you're saying third parties can't field candidates? HarveyDarkey Sep 2012 #11
Who's this we you speak of? We here don't need 3rd parties. DevonRex Sep 2012 #23
Not at all, I'm a Democrat HarveyDarkey Sep 2012 #24
Tremble, for the grand inquisitor speaks. Union Scribe Sep 2012 #52
It's remarkable in how extraordinary undemocratic it is. Luminous Animal Sep 2012 #25
Third parties pretending to be progressive shouldn't be accepting money pnwmom Sep 2012 #55
Say what? renie408 Sep 2012 #58
You might be interested in this. pnwmom Sep 2012 #65
This message was self-deleted by its author HarveyDarkey Sep 2012 #36
That was 12 years ago HarveyDarkey Sep 2012 #40
link no longer works... spanone Sep 2012 #12
Here you go.. Luminous Animal Sep 2012 #26
Okay, now that I've seen the article, Skidmore Sep 2012 #31
HUGE DU rec!... SidDithers Sep 2012 #13
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #14
Nader's mouth is Cha Sep 2012 #15
Fuck you Nader. Please find total irrelevance soon. banned from Kos Sep 2012 #19
Fuck Nader. Republican shill. Scum. Just yuck. Nt DevonRex Sep 2012 #20
Nader is a crotchety attention whore who never had any real aspiration to make things better. phleshdef Sep 2012 #21
crotchety attention whore<< Winner!! 2on2u Sep 2012 #32
And his fan cultists as well. Naderites are useless, without exceptions. nt geek tragedy Sep 2012 #27
K and R DonCoquixote Sep 2012 #44
So I assume that you disagree with this. MadHound Sep 2012 #46
Ooh, you've been challenged by a Nader article in Common Dreams! DevonRex Sep 2012 #49
Nader is irrelevant and desperate to BE relevant. nt WeekendWarrior Sep 2012 #53
A truly irrelevant person could not inspire such hatred. Union Scribe Sep 2012 #54
Yep....this place is entering the realm of the truly comic.... AnOhioan Sep 2012 #62
Ann Coulter is irrelevant, too. Kinda blows that theory, doesn't it? nt WeekendWarrior Sep 2012 #63
I hear WalMart Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #57
Obama has done things which by any objective standards constitute war crimes. redgreenandblue Sep 2012 #59
Does everyone want to fight about this now? porphyrian Sep 2012 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»it can't be said enough. ...»Reply #46