Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,348 posts)
2. I'm not. Not because I know all the arguments, but because I'd rather err on the side of
Thu Oct 1, 2020, 03:09 PM
Oct 2020

the good that 230 does for us end users than the good it would do for Trump and Barr to end it.

The strength of Silicon monopolies keeps getting posed as a threat to us, and yet the other big player -- this right wing scofflaw government -- wants to end even the good that 230 does.

The real problem is who gets to run the internet -- private Silicon Valley owners or the U.S. DOJ.

Right now, I'm going with Silicon Valley's best efforts and not with Barr's dark goals.

End a nation's free communications, with all its flaws, and with all the Valley heads are trying to do to support their nation, even if it seems to us like not enough, you definitely end up with nationwide governmental propaganda control.

Warren's seemingly fair points about breaking up the Big Five miss the point about 230 in our political arena.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In the BFD Zone: Congress...»Reply #2