General Discussion

Celerity

(54,878 posts)

33. does not read like a hit piece to me, so I will pass on the framing nt

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Sun Oct 4, 2020, 10:34 PM

Oct 2020

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NYT posts hit article on Biden's health. [View all] RandySF Oct 2020 OP

For those of us who don't subscribe can you give any info on the article? mucifer Oct 2020 #1

Claiming the Biden campaign hasn't transparent about his testing protocols. RandySF Oct 2020 #2

From the paragraphs people have posted, it doesn't seem too bad. mucifer Oct 2020 #8

It's not, and based on old campaign practices (it appears.) elleng Oct 2020 #9

A clip uppityperson Oct 2020 #3

One example: elleng Oct 2020 #6

I don't subscribe and the link worked for me. SharonClark Oct 2020 #17

Your IP address could have indicated that you qualified to read the article for free. Blue_true Oct 2020 #40

4 paragraphs NRaleighLiberal Oct 2020 #4

They need to make up for the articles on Trump's taxes JI7 Oct 2020 #5

Rupert Murdoch (Fox News) owned trash paper. (nt) Elwood P Dowd Oct 2020 #7

Murdoch owns the Times now? TreasonousBastard Oct 2020 #12

Sorry, got the Times and Post mixed up. Elwood P Dowd Oct 2020 #22

No problem-- mine are the same age, and one of them doesn't work at all. Amazing what I TreasonousBastard Oct 2020 #23

So this is all they could find to nitpick about? Walleye Oct 2020 #10

But you'll post the link. As the quoted passages seem to say, the article is a reasonable assessment TreasonousBastard Oct 2020 #11

I agree as to the risk - Ms. Toad Oct 2020 #14

Seems there's a lot of slack in those quidelines... TreasonousBastard Oct 2020 #18

The article stretches the guidelines beyond the breaking point Ms. Toad Oct 2020 #13

But you missed this part, even after I mentioned it earlier... TreasonousBastard Oct 2020 #19

Let's hope Mr. Trump wasn't yet releasing that much virus. LisaL Oct 2020 #24

Agreed. I hope so too, but you just don't know. TreasonousBastard Oct 2020 #26

No I didnt. Ms. Toad Oct 2020 #25

Curiously, I didn't read it that way at all-- just another background article. TreasonousBastard Oct 2020 #28

Here. Ms. Toad Oct 2020 #32

It is not a stretch. I read that and simply saw it as recognition that the guidelines are guidelines TreasonousBastard Oct 2020 #35

The guidelines are very specific as to what constitutes exposure. Ms. Toad Oct 2020 #36

Guidelines, schmidelines Biden was possibly exposed... TreasonousBastard Oct 2020 #37

Sorry - but I both a defender of and subscriber to the Times Ms. Toad Oct 2020 #38

I totally agree! See my reply down thread. nt LAS14 Oct 2020 #29

It was a hit piece - the language was very accusatory. SharonClark Oct 2020 #15

yup. typical nyt. ihas2stinkyfeet Oct 2020 #30

+1 dalton99a Oct 2020 #39

I'd say the OP is a hit piece on the Times... brooklynite Oct 2020 #16

I found out years ago that no matter what you write, you cannot control how it is received. TreasonousBastard Oct 2020 #21

You mean the same New York Times Trumpocalypse Oct 2020 #34

I mean the New York Times that's being published today. brooklynite Oct 2020 #41

Which has a questionable history Trumpocalypse Oct 2020 #44

I looked up the author. He seems pretty down the line. I would not worry about it. Quixote1818 Oct 2020 #20

Oh, come on!!! Biden was at least 12 feet away from Trump. LAS14 Oct 2020 #27

As I have said twice-- the CDC guideines have not been given by God and Trump... TreasonousBastard Oct 2020 #31

does not read like a hit piece to me, so I will pass on the framing nt Celerity Oct 2020 #33

I read only a small amount, but it simply sounded like a reporter trying to keep the public Blue_true Oct 2020 #42

like so many have said, everything Trump touches, dies (Biden will be a huge exception, thank fuck) Celerity Oct 2020 #43