Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

longship

(40,416 posts)

2. Excellent post, TXLaw

Reply to Texas Lawyer (Original post)

Wed Sep 26, 2012, 11:05 PM

Sep 2012

Well argued case, sir.

With so much to gain, why not? Then, there are undoubtedly many CDs which could be individually targetted. Too bad we don't have a 50 state strategy this season. That worked wonderfully.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Here's why Team Obama should fight in Arizona, Indiana and Montana in addition to the "swing states" [View all] Texas Lawyer Sep 2012 OP

Plus it forces the repubs to spend money in those states. muntrv Sep 2012 #1

Links to analysis indentfying key house where we can make the Repubs spread their cash more thinly: Texas Lawyer Sep 2012 #4

Excellent post, TXLaw longship Sep 2012 #2

We MUST push the momentum down ballot to hold the Senate and weaken the Tea Party grip on the House! Texas Lawyer Sep 2012 #3

thank you! ibegurpard Sep 2012 #5

agreed outsideworld Sep 2012 #6

2016 Jeff In Milwaukee Sep 2012 #7

I think Arizona and Texas are both destined to go blue, but Texas is years behind Arizona (the shift Texas Lawyer Sep 2012 #8

He's only down 3 in Arizona? ARIZONA?! Go for it! JaneyVee Sep 2012 #9

Arizona's electoral votes would be nice, but wins in the Arizona Senate race and in AZCD-1 & AZCD-9 Texas Lawyer Sep 2012 #10