Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Yonnie3

(19,570 posts)

6. I got your point

Reply to still_one (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 7, 2020, 09:03 AM

Oct 2020

The CDC guidance is obviously aimed at getting "America back to work," without waiting for tests. It has little to no scientific merit and would allow one to shop for an "expert" to get what advice you prefer.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I am looking at the CDC recommendations for when someone who has had COVID when they can be around [View all] still_one Oct 2020 OP

I look to Canada and Australia for guidelines RockCreek Oct 2020 #1

Isn't dexamethasone an immunosuppressant? Yonnie3 Oct 2020 #2

My point is their recommendations leave too much room for ambiguity. All they needed to say still_one Oct 2020 #3

Yeah I like the "two negative tests" they used to have soothsayer Oct 2020 #4

If you read into the CDC verbiage, they also say there are exceptions. In my view there is no still_one Oct 2020 #5

I got your point Yonnie3 Oct 2020 #6

I am sure. They changed their guidelines. They used to say one need to be tested negative still_one Oct 2020 #7

I recall this two test requirement as well. Yonnie3 Oct 2020 #8