Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
16. To answer the question ...
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 01:29 PM
Jan 2012

"Why does 1% have two parties and we have none" -- because you have to start another party if you want one (or take over an existing one). No one is going to do it for you. You're not there waiting for some hero or heroine to come along and answer all your needs. That's the white knight theory of politics.

We often talk here about the "paternalism" of the Republican party (and they talk about the "maternalism" of the Democratic party). But this seems childish to me. You want another choice? Don't complain about no one giving it to you: go create it. It's what our system permits (though it won't be an easy job. I might even be interested if it's viable and rational.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Because the 1% have all the money liberal N proud Jan 2012 #1
recommend. -eom Huey P. Long Jan 2012 #2
Both parties are the same!!1! JNelson6563 Jan 2012 #3
There you go... MineralMan Jan 2012 #5
OMG, thank you MM! Can't tell you how relieved I am! JNelson6563 Jan 2012 #13
You know, a lot of those people who got the extensions MineralMan Jan 2012 #15
however, that is not a quote taken from the article G_j Jan 2012 #14
Pretty clearly implied, no? JNelson6563 Jan 2012 #19
I didn't think so G_j Jan 2012 #21
Get money out of politics nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #25
Yes, for years that has been the story we hear - just alike. But they need to ask someone like me jwirr Jan 2012 #20
And WHAT did the Democratic Party Leadership give up... bvar22 Jan 2012 #28
Bush extended unemployment benefits more than once so it is hard to rule it out. TheKentuckian Jan 2012 #29
Sadly, the 99% have the attention of about 1%. MineralMan Jan 2012 #4
And that's an interesting, and puzzling, perspective, considering Zorra Jan 2012 #17
Time = the "foreign" protestor of the year. Note the pic does not appear to be OWS lol nt msongs Jan 2012 #22
Acually the photo is from an Occupier, funny THAT nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #26
actually was a pic from OWS. the original i think even had 99% on the bandana... but it was stylized dionysus Jan 2012 #27
This is right where they have lost me. If they were so free Maraya1969 Jan 2012 #6
"Occupy protestors know that many Republicans view them as an extension of the Democratic Party." Thaddeus Kosciuszko Jan 2012 #7
There is a glaring reason why republicans believe Occupy is an extension of the Democratic Zorra Jan 2012 #8
that point is going to get lost -- especially since this thread has turned into a sub-thread. xchrom Jan 2012 #9
Well, no surprise...that is the primary element of Zorra Jan 2012 #10
Funny thing... though the accusation has been made that somene said the two parties are the same... Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #30
+1 xchrom Jan 2012 #31
Exaclty Zorra. OWS is a manifestation of the failure of the new Democrats. -eom Huey P. Long Jan 2012 #11
well said nt G_j Jan 2012 #12
Agree ... simply and well said. nt Raine Jan 2012 #24
To answer the question ... frazzled Jan 2012 #16
We don't need no stinkin permits a simple pattern Jan 2012 #18
^ Wilms Jan 2012 #23
K&R (nt) T S Justly Jan 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Occupy New Hampshire Deri...»Reply #16