Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sen Klobuchar just asked Judge Barrett whether it's illegal under federal law to intimidate voters [View all]dware
(18,058 posts)58. So true. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sen Klobuchar just asked Judge Barrett whether it's illegal under federal law to intimidate voters [View all]
Nevilledog
Oct 2020
OP
My autocorrect gives me some variation of "fuck" for just about every word I type.
Nevilledog
Oct 2020
#15
There have been times on the potty where I've tried both. Profanity always wins.
erronis
Oct 2020
#46
I'm with you on that one, where's the experience? Thought it was less than 2 years.
KS Toronado
Oct 2020
#32
Barrett thought she was being clever, but Klobuchar completely outmaneuvered her
greenjar_01
Oct 2020
#16
Amy Cultmember Barrett thought it was up to her to decide the question of
BusyBeingBest
Oct 2020
#20
If ever there's a large enough Democratic majority she has to be impeached.
Eid Ma Clack Shaw
Oct 2020
#23
To "cook something up" would be self defeating, lies usually see the light of day.
KS Toronado
Oct 2020
#37
Great job Amy! Only a republican nominee for SCOTUS could not answer a simple question as that!
Catcar
Oct 2020
#42
Barrett proving herself unfit to be a nominee and those supporting her as unfit for office. nt
cstanleytech
Oct 2020
#44
If she refused to answer, then she's been prepped on what her purpose will be for the 2020 election.
C Moon
Oct 2020
#51
That was not a hypothetical case. It was a question about her knowledge of the law.
Lonestarblue
Oct 2020
#60