Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skraxx

(2,971 posts)
18. Incorrect, It Has Been 9 Since the 1860's, FDR threatened to increase but ultimately didn't.
Fri Oct 16, 2020, 12:35 PM
Oct 2020
https://www.britannica.com/story/why-are-there-nine-justices-on-the-us-supreme-court

"Basically, the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to determine how many justices sit on SCOTUS. This number has ranged between 5 and 10, but since 1869 the number has been set at 9."

--snip--

"President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed a reorganization bill to Congress that would allow the president to appoint a new justice for each one who was at least 70 years old. Congress did not oblige, of course: this was seen as a court-packing scheme that would have given Roosevelt too much power. Roosevelt’s motives were to push through his New Deal, which SCOTUS had continually worked against during the president’s first term."
Joe should def put 5 more justices on the Court. 634-5789 Oct 2020 #1
Six MurrayDelph Oct 2020 #16
I Like That Idea, Start High and Negotiate down to 4 or 5 more. Skraxx Oct 2020 #24
20 more, seriously. Goodheart Oct 2020 #19
because they're lifetime appointments. There should be term limits. onetexan Oct 2020 #33
Because they ARE lifetime appointments is the exact reason why they should be made individually less Goodheart Oct 2020 #35
Without Feinstein and Manchin, we need at least 52 seats Polybius Oct 2020 #21
I clearly heard him say that he will let voters know before Election Day. Ninga Oct 2020 #2
He didn't actually say anything more about this before election day, did he? (n/t) thesquanderer Nov 2020 #38
Here is what he said. Ninga Nov 2020 #39
Thanks! n/t thesquanderer Nov 2020 #40
Sure! Ninga Nov 2020 #41
No. brooklynite Oct 2020 #3
If he is there are a number of variables to overcome Buckeyeblue Oct 2020 #4
Between 2 & 3 also add remove filibuster. That has to happen first. Statistical Oct 2020 #28
That's what I thought I was hearing. lark Oct 2020 #5
Completely agree. I took it to mean Joe was lobbing a warning to GOP that if u dare i will do it. onetexan Oct 2020 #9
Feinstein too opposes ending it Polybius Oct 2020 #23
Gillibrand has weighed in on this? n/t moonscape Oct 2020 #30
Not recently that I know of but she was opposed to ending it when the Dems were in charge. lark Oct 2020 #37
Increase the size of the courts Chainfire Oct 2020 #6
That would require a constitutional amendment. Statistical Oct 2020 #29
What Moscow Mitch has been doing is court packing. NNadir Oct 2020 #7
It's not up to him; there's currently a statute setting the number at 9, The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2020 #8
This is where I think the Vice President Biden is making a mistake PRETZEL Oct 2020 #11
Actually, I believe it has been set at 9 since the 1860's... Wounded Bear Oct 2020 #12
It was re-set again at 9 in 1948 after FDR's unsuccessful attempt The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2020 #15
Incorrect, It Has Been 9 Since the 1860's, FDR threatened to increase but ultimately didn't. Skraxx Oct 2020 #18
That's true. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2020 #20
Interestingly, It's Where The Term "Court Packing" Came From Skraxx Oct 2020 #22
Agree. FDR didn't like what the court was doing with some of his New Deal programs The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2020 #25
Indeed, In My View We Are Left With Little Options BUT to "Modernize" or "Balance" Skraxx Oct 2020 #26
Ding Ding Ding!! onetexan Oct 2020 #34
I think we all know it beachbumbob Oct 2020 #10
exactly how i took it. ihas2stinkyfeet Oct 2020 #13
That was my sense. Go, Biden! flor-de-jasmim Oct 2020 #14
Yes, that is what I think. Demsrule86 Oct 2020 #17
He Sure Was! Skraxx Oct 2020 #27
Well, and I like how he thinks, she's not confirmed YET JCMach1 Oct 2020 #31
No. McConnell & Co WILL confirm Barrett in hard-right court packing. Hortensis Oct 2020 #32
Expansion is unpacking lagomorph777 Oct 2020 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question: Was Biden signa...»Reply #18