Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UTUSN

(77,795 posts)
11. Don't do it, not prudent. Ana NAVARRO on The View gave the answer: It's up to Congress.
Sun Oct 18, 2020, 01:32 AM
Oct 2020

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If only RePutinicans were held to the same litmus tests. NoMoreRepugs Oct 2020 #1
That is why they are losing. Trump layed bare all the lies and hypocricy. applegrove Oct 2020 #3
He's Going To Support Adding Justices sfstaxprep Oct 2020 #2
And some of the Obama's federal court nominees McConnell would not put applegrove Oct 2020 #4
We can add federal judges, can't we? BigmanPigman Oct 2020 #5
I know nothing about that.I was just saying it goes to the question of who is packing the court. applegrove Oct 2020 #7
We need 67 Senators to convict after impeachment. Patterson Oct 2020 #8
That's for the judges? Well, then can we add more instead? BigmanPigman Oct 2020 #9
I believe we can and I also believe we should because otherwise many rulings by those courts will be cstanleytech Oct 2020 #19
I think he will only do that if they commit total hypocrisy and decide to bring her nomination to cstanleytech Oct 2020 #18
Balancing Supreme Court. greyl Oct 2020 #6
⬆⬆⬆ THIS is the term we should use. Duppers Oct 2020 #16
He's going to state that the GOP has politicized the court by using political tricks to cheat andym Oct 2020 #10
Don't do it, not prudent. Ana NAVARRO on The View gave the answer: It's up to Congress. UTUSN Oct 2020 #11
I agree. Biden shouldn't say he's for it or against it. There's no win in either answer. unblock Oct 2020 #12
Whew, when I saw there was a Reply thought i was going to get flamed!1 Thanks UTUSN Oct 2020 #13
Do I do that a lot? unblock Oct 2020 #14
I reacted to the yellow highlight, not you personally, am just UTUSN Oct 2020 #20
Ah, that can happen around here at times. unblock Oct 2020 #23
Wow, now I'm 'whelmed! Thanks, not for myself but for who you are! UTUSN Oct 2020 #24
Isn't it a win if he says he's against it? Polybius Oct 2020 #25
It might demoralize some on our side unblock Oct 2020 #29
If he's going to say something he should just say 'it'll be up to Congress' ... mr_lebowski Oct 2020 #15
Yup. orangecrush Oct 2020 #17
Exactly. He should say that, and then in time, add as many judges as it takes to unpack that court. Earthshine2 Oct 2020 #21
Once congress expands, does the president need to sign into law ? MichMan Oct 2020 #22
Yes, both the House and Senate have to pass it Polybius Oct 2020 #26
I don't think he should say anything. Keep any strategy hidden until after the election. Hotler Oct 2020 #27
:yawn: bigtree Oct 2020 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Biden to Address Expandin...»Reply #11