Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: USC Fratboy Email Calls Women “Targets;” Declares “Giving Them A Name Is Pointless” [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)117. Wrong - YALE.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
USC Fratboy Email Calls Women “Targets;” Declares “Giving Them A Name Is Pointless” [View all]
one_voice
Jan 2012
OP
it is a free for all on women. here on du, too. sexism and misogyny has gotten a thumbs up.
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#1
i have been saying for too long that we are, and why, and it is a huge issue. we address it or we
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#13
what does that have to do with this issue? divert to talk about all the zillion of men being falsely
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#58
not that there is concern a man does this, but your need to dismiss women, again.
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#71
i have seen you dismiss sexist and misogynist behavior in every post. no one should bother with
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#73
i didnt complain about the mens forum. you might be getting confused with a different
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#85
nope? you accuse, know for a fact, but you cant clue me in what you are accusing me of?
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#91
the issue i had before du3 opened was no moderators and a jury system. that has nothing to do with
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#97
"Sex crimes down"--NOT according to MY sources. Please update your information
BlancheSplanchnik
Jan 2012
#77
Actually, my life got in the way--halfway through my reply to you too.
BlancheSplanchnik
Jan 2012
#129
My God, if snark were money, you'd be a billionaire. You're blocked. nt
mistertrickster
Jan 2012
#140
Haven't heard that term in 40 years? Time to update your information:
BlancheSplanchnik
Jan 2012
#79
only 'explanation' ... "that age" once is that the little head is thinking for the big head.
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#111
they are not even drooling over her. they are making comments to degrade, dehumanize women
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#17
no i was not saying rape. yes i was saying misogyny. thank you for allowing me to clarify. nt
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#25
college chant ... no means yes. gang rape porn a favorite. where does sisters, mothers
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#26
Dumbass fratboy should read the paper. The term "rape" has been redefined, so to speak.
flvegan
Jan 2012
#29
what i am finding is when it is blatanly presented, how consistently people ignore the issue
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#74
It's amazing that so many people can apparently maintain such a huge blind spot...
redqueen
Jan 2012
#137
+1. yes the nets, for all to see, when applying for a job. i could do without just testosterone
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#41
What a ludicrous post filled with grossly offensive overgeneralizations.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2012
#75
we have a twofer. keep wemmez as virgins, all wemmez is whores for mans play.
seabeyond
Jan 2012
#50
FYI, read here including comments at links: http://dailytrojan.com/?s=kappa+sigma+viral+email
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2012
#76
Please see post #114, thanks. Now if you'd posted about this upcoming DVD release, no argument.
proverbialwisdom
Jan 2012
#120
This story is nearly a year old. ONE student wrote this (and he was not from USC); it
LeftinOH
Jan 2012
#114
I'm not angry at anyone who isn't invested in minimizing the issue of rape culture.
redqueen
Jan 2012
#145