Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Time to Attack Iran [View all]
 

SixthSense

(829 posts)
20. well
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 02:28 PM
Jan 2012

if he took away the word "Bilderbergers" and gave the list of the very powerful people who compose its membership instead, I think you might agree that those people are very interested in getting us into war. Look up their membership list. It is a real organization and those people do meet to discuss policy, that part is purely factual and not CT. That group is so elite it looks down on the rest of the top 1% of the top 1%, and that group is also the ones who benefit most from war.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Time to Attack Iran [View all] SixthSense Jan 2012 OP
Ironic, is it not . . . markpkessinger Jan 2012 #1
Aren't they signatories to the nuclear nonproliferation treaty that also mahina Jan 2012 #2
Why do you want him fired? nt Dreamer Tatum Jan 2012 #3
because he's trying to get us in a war SixthSense Jan 2012 #5
I don't want brussels sprouts - should I have the grocery store closed? nt Dreamer Tatum Jan 2012 #15
What if the brussel sprouts were forced down your throat by the grocer? superpatriotman Jan 2012 #23
I'd find another grocer. Dreamer Tatum Jan 2012 #24
A regional ME war is coming in 2012. roamer65 Jan 2012 #4
screw US interests in the Middle East and beyond Motown_Johnny Jan 2012 #6
and the Iranis are going to be in for a rude awakening when the UAE and KSA ship their oil through JCMach1 Jan 2012 #7
Kroenig can be the first one in. He can live in that world, I won't. leveymg Jan 2012 #8
+9000! Zalatix Jan 2012 #26
I wouldn't worry, Obama is afraid to even posture overmuch in that direction. Umbral Jan 2012 #9
Really? SixthSense Jan 2012 #10
Naw, I'll stand by it. All we'll see toward Iran, untill after elections will be bluff and bluster. Umbral Jan 2012 #11
Election/campaign rheortic have been known to sway opinions. sad sally Jan 2012 #17
The source for this piece is commonaffairs . com which is published by the Council on Foreign peacetalksforall Jan 2012 #12
No Bilderberger CT nonsense, please. MineralMan Jan 2012 #13
the war drums pounding are not CT SixthSense Jan 2012 #16
That's not what I'm talking about. MineralMan Jan 2012 #18
well SixthSense Jan 2012 #20
I'm not going to discuss the Bilderberger Group with you. MineralMan Jan 2012 #21
that's your prerogative SixthSense Jan 2012 #22
I'm more worried about the Pentaverate, anyway Dreamer Tatum Jan 2012 #25
Did you hear Panetta on Face the Nation yesterday? Sounded like he's itching to bomb Iran. sad sally Jan 2012 #19
I, for one, can't wait for the daily "Iran Liberation!" updates. Or Syria. Or whatever. As long Romulox Jan 2012 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Time to Attack Iran »Reply #20