Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
27. How about a response like: House proposed $5 billion cut for State Department and foreign operation
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 04:25 PM
Sep 2012

From April 25, 2012

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/04/25/house_proposes_5_billion_cut_for_state_department_and_foreign_operations

The House Appropriations Committee proposed cutting the State Department and foreign operations budget by more than $5 billion next year, in its annual allocations released Tuesday.

The Obama administration actually requested modest increases in funding for the State Department and USAID for fiscal 2013 when it released its budget request in February. While the Congress doesn't divide up the accounts the same way as the administration, in an apples-to-apples comparison, the House Appropriations Committees' allocation for State and foreign operations for fiscal 2013, $48.4 billion, would represent a 12 percent cut from the administration's $54.71 billion request for the same accounts.

The House proposed fully funding the president's $8.2 billion request for State Department funding related to the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, known as the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) account. Therefore, the remainder of the funding proposed by the House, $40.1 billion for the base budget, would represent a 14 percent cut to the administration's request for non-war related diplomatic and development activities.

snip

Subcommittee ranking Democrat Nita Lowey (D-NY) criticized the cuts in her own statement to The Cable.

"I am disappointed by this short-sighted allocation and the Republicans' decision to ignore bipartisan funding levels agreed to in the Budget Control Act," she said. "We must not make cuts that fundamentally weaken our national security interests."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How about: "Ah, Mitt, that it were as simple as you seem to think..." landolfi Sep 2012 #1
The first debate timber84 Sep 2012 #2
"Play by the rules jackass..." Rosco T. Sep 2012 #3
Oops! My bad. And I even noted it on my calendar "domestic policy"! Today may not be my best day... CTyankee Sep 2012 #7
Just to clarify.. "Jackass" is Mittens Rosco T. Sep 2012 #8
Oh, I knew that was what you were referring to! But I have now edited/corrected my post CTyankee Sep 2012 #10
The first debate's domestic policy. Arkana Sep 2012 #4
Yep, mea culpa. I have edited my post accordingly...thanks for letting me know... CTyankee Sep 2012 #9
please correct me if wrong, but wasn't the State Department's budget slashed by... Raster Sep 2012 #5
Not without support from Dems in the Senate. GeorgeGist Sep 2012 #30
Cite state department budget cuts by repugs Mponti Sep 2012 #6
How utterly inconvenient (for Mitt) Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2012 #11
Do Republicans really want to debate Americans' being attacked by Muslims? Hello, 9/11. Hello, 241 WinkyDink Sep 2012 #12
LOL ...third debate.. DearAbby Sep 2012 #13
I know, but it is the one area that worries me. If the campaign were smart (a BIG if) it would CTyankee Sep 2012 #15
The pressure on Romney for this first debate DearAbby Sep 2012 #28
Do you think they'll just give up and cancel the other two debates? CTyankee Sep 2012 #31
"The security of embassies is the responsibility of the host nation, Mitt." bluedigger Sep 2012 #14
We don't want all our embassies to look like forts ... lpbk2713 Sep 2012 #16
Good response and I think Obama would say something very like that. But he should also be CTyankee Sep 2012 #17
That would be a precious gift. lpbk2713 Sep 2012 #18
It would be a precious gift, I agree. And other presidents have had similar instances... CTyankee Sep 2012 #20
I believe by then we will have acted on intelligence and wacked a bunch of the guys who did the deed winstars Sep 2012 #19
I think you are right and the third debate certainly is far enough away for something to happen CTyankee Sep 2012 #22
Everything in this election matters; it's a historical record breaker. porphyrian Sep 2012 #21
But that to me sounds like he's avoiding the question. CTyankee Sep 2012 #23
That's why I didn't answer for him, I said what I'd say. porphyrian Sep 2012 #24
Yup. Well, I think we are just going to have to trust that this is something the campaign has CTyankee Sep 2012 #25
I feel they are on-the-ball professionals and I trust them. I'm sure they are working hard... porphyrian Sep 2012 #26
How about a response like: House proposed $5 billion cut for State Department and foreign operation DreamGypsy Sep 2012 #27
Excellent! Obama can say "Glad you brought that up, Governor." And then let him have it with CTyankee Sep 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In the third debate, Mitt...»Reply #27