General Discussion

FelineOverlord

(3,851 posts)

11. Don't think the article is that far off. Don't see how anyone could read it and think they are

Fri Oct 23, 2020, 11:43 AM

Oct 2020

It's the WAY the NYT and other media outlets tries to frame things. Over and over again.

They keep expecting him to act NORMAL.

They keep talking about a change in "tone."

And how many articles has the Times had in the last few years about talking to Trump voters in diners? Especially in blue areas and how isolated these poor dimwits felt.

Or when they tried to claim a bunch of people they interviewed were "swing" voters when one of the people they spoke to had been to 23 Trump rallies? And they had quoted her in several other articles.

NONE of the people interviewed for the article were swing voters. Not one.

Link to tweet

And how many times MAGA "Access" Haberman has done PR work for Trump and some of her Times buddies leap to her defense on Twitter when she gets called out?

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The New York Times Is Doing It AGAIN [View all] FelineOverlord Oct 2020 OP

Such bullshit! marlakay Oct 2020 #1

He's a performer, a used car salesman. BlueTsunami2018 Oct 2020 #3

I disagree. Turin_C3PO Oct 2020 #6

Yes, incompetent. BlueTsunami2018 Oct 2020 #9

I hear it was better. pwb Oct 2020 #2

trumps right about one thing. the new york times is a failed institution. bullimiami Oct 2020 #4

Don't think the article is that far off. Don't see how anyone could read it and think they are Hoyt Oct 2020 #5

Don't think the article is that far off. Don't see how anyone could read it and think they are FelineOverlord Oct 2020 #11

This is inexcusable for a supposedly objective journalist Yeehah Oct 2020 #19

I don't see a problem with that headline/narrative. David__77 Oct 2020 #7

Did you read the A section of the NYT this morning? maxsolomon Oct 2020 #8

K & R Deacon Blue Oct 2020 #10

Totally Disagree FelineOverlord Oct 2020 #12

You're rehashing 2016. maxsolomon Oct 2020 #16

Mr Jollet has it right 110%. triron Oct 2020 #13

Yes, they are. I noticed also of course. Same people in charge with same agenda. nt Hortensis Oct 2020 #14

If you have a subscription, I would recommend Marius25 Oct 2020 #15

And then re-subscribe and then re-cancel it. maxsolomon Oct 2020 #17

..." the ability to lie in a dignified manner does not really confer presidential dignity" crimycarny Oct 2020 #18