Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rsdsharp

(12,010 posts)

4. I believe it's the other way around.

Reply to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #2)

Fri Oct 23, 2020, 04:06 PM

Oct 2020

That’s why the Republican “health care plans” always include being able to sell across state lines. Companies domiciled in states where anything goes could sell junk plans into states where the restrictions on what the companies can do are more stringent.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

When, not if, ACA is destroyed, can individual states FORCE the insurance companies to [View all] Eliot Rosewater Oct 2020 OP

Yes. In theory states can regulate stopdiggin Oct 2020 #1

My memory is they are regulated by their domicile state, not the states they sell in Eliot Rosewater Oct 2020 #2

Believe each state regulates health insurers. That's why you see Blue Cross California, BC NY, Hoyt Oct 2020 #3

I believe it's the other way around. rsdsharp Oct 2020 #4

That is what I remember. Eliot Rosewater Oct 2020 #6

I think it is both stopdiggin Oct 2020 #5