Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Iggy

(1,418 posts)
21. Good Points, However...
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 07:41 AM
Sep 2012

anyone here remember NAFTA??

North American Free Trade Act? pushed for by numerous democrats in congress and President
Bill Clinton?

it's past time to look at just how devastating NAFTA was to U.S. workers/jobs and the fact it's a
gigantic failure in terms of what it was supposed to do in Mexico-- raise wages/income of the
workers there and improve working conditions there.

Most of the debate about NAFTA has focused on the movement of plants to Mexico and the direct loss of American jobs as Mexican laborers earning less than $2 an hour are used to replace American workers making six or eight times as much, plus health and pension benefits. Though there are trade disputes with Canada regarding specific industries, America's partnership to the north does not spark the same kind of fundamental concern. Income, living conditions and the rule of law are similar in Canada to U.S. standards, which puts trade on a more level playing field.

The news media has tried to downplay the celebration of NAFTA's first decade, arguing that while the grandiose benefits from "free trade" have not materialized, the American job loses to Mexico have not been as bad as critics predicted. But saying that NAFTA's failure could have been worse is not exactly the kind of verdict that warrants a grand gala.

One of the most infamous predictions of NAFTA benefits was made by Gary Hufbauer of the Institute for International Economics, a well-financed "free trade" think tank. In a 1992 study, Hufbauer claimed, "NAFTA will generate a $7 to $9 billion surplus that would ensure the net creation of 170,000 jobs in the U.S. economy the first year." This did not happen, of course, and as the Wall Street Journal reported in its October 26, 1995 edition, "Gary Hufbauer...whose predictions of NAFTA job gains were embraced by the Clinton and Bush White Houses now figures the surging trade deficit with Mexico has cost the U.S. 225,000 jobs."


Here's an example of what NAFTA did to manufacturing jobs in the U.S.-- prior to NAFTA some clothes were actually made in the
United States.. one company was Fruit of the Loom (yeah, the company that makes your tightie whities). after NAFTA was enacted
more or less all clothing companies in the U.S. moved out- to the macquiladoras in Mexico and central America-- all but Fruit of the Loom. they insisted they would stay in the U.S. and actually spoke out against NAFTA.

of course the greedhead clothing companies that moved out of the U.S. began selling cheaper clothes in the U.S., which
Fruit of the Loom could not compete against-- since they were paying a living wage to their U.S. workers.

Yep, you guessed it-- Fruit of the Loom ended up moving their manufacturing facilities out of the U.S.- so they could compete. if you can't
beat 'em, join 'em!

So thanks Bill Clinton and "democrats" in congress-- thanks for aiding and abetting the destruction of manufacturing
jobs in the U.S.

http://americaneconomicalert.org/view_art.asp?Prod_ID=715

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great post! B Calm Sep 2012 #1
I'll tell you the truth jsmirman Sep 2012 #4
Coming from cali - I'm too familiar w/ these kinds of business plans. xchrom Sep 2012 #2
This is exactly what the GOP has been doing to America since the days of St Ronnie coldwaterintheface Sep 2012 #3
Yeah, on a first run jsmirman Sep 2012 #5
It is very difficult to write for/to the ignorant coldwaterintheface Sep 2012 #7
I think that was a hard story to play with anything but kid gloves jsmirman Sep 2012 #9
So being a sports fan are you saying most sports fans are idiots coldwaterintheface Sep 2012 #11
I'm saying the NFL is really important to a lot of people jsmirman Sep 2012 #12
Now how many of them acatually vote? coldwaterintheface Sep 2012 #14
Folks who like the Packers, for example? jsmirman Sep 2012 #15
More of a percentage of voters who watch the NFL coldwaterintheface Sep 2012 #22
Bain also bribed the current CEOs and executives of those businesses fasttense Sep 2012 #6
Excellent point jsmirman Sep 2012 #8
K&R HiPointDem Sep 2012 #10
Thnaks for the summary. Prometheus Bound Sep 2012 #13
Great - that's what I was shooting for jsmirman Sep 2012 #16
It's what the mob calls a "bust out." tclambert Sep 2012 #17
The difference is that a bust out is illegal, while this is "excellent business" jsmirman Sep 2012 #25
Every time theKed Sep 2012 #38
LBO financing isn't done by conventional banks jmowreader Sep 2012 #39
In the simplist terms of all- a parasite needs a live host. canoeist52 Sep 2012 #18
Pretty good description jsmirman Sep 2012 #26
+1,000! Well said! Zalatix Sep 2012 #36
Excellent post malaise Sep 2012 #19
Same plan the R's have for America, including auctioning off the assets at fire-sale prices. Scuba Sep 2012 #20
That's just what I've come to think Romney's true plan is jsmirman Sep 2012 #28
Romney's secret plan to end the war on wealthy people. Scuba Sep 2012 #30
Good Points, However... Iggy Sep 2012 #21
In the old days, at least the guy did get the protection. Egalitarian Thug Sep 2012 #23
So would that make Bain "The Mormon Mafia"? meow2u3 Sep 2012 #35
There has been a Mormon Mafia for generations. It, along with the corporate Mafia, runs Las Vegas. Egalitarian Thug Sep 2012 #37
we need to examine why we have corporations ThomThom Sep 2012 #24
Good description. Thanks. yardwork Sep 2012 #27
Thanks jsmirman Sep 2012 #29
Bain is a financial predator Turbineguy Sep 2012 #31
If we want to talk cheating gulliver Sep 2012 #32
Willard and Bain plus BiBi Wellstone ruled Sep 2012 #33
Do you have a list jsmirman Sep 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Bain Killed Good Comp...»Reply #21