Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WHAT THE HELL. [View all]flamingdem
(40,905 posts)87. I wonder just how many "incidents" of instability have occurred
already that made her state this ..one thing is for sure Ann doesn't want to suffer being First Lady, she knows it's nightmarish enough now to deal with this man and his issues.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I second her concern. I'm not sure he'll make it through to election day.
Voice for Peace
Sep 2012
#2
A woman who called Thom Hartmann a few days ago said she works as a
Dont call me Shirley
Sep 2012
#15
"We ... we, uh, use Ann sparingly right now so that people don't get tired of her."
CrispyQ
Sep 2012
#89
You know what would be something at this point? If the idiot spouted off a secret.
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2012
#73
Karma...ya gotta love it. She said it so eloquently too. I love how she snuck that one in!
jonesgirl
Sep 2012
#51
self-sabotage, not necessarily stupidity. If she's conflicted over being 1st lady
magical thyme
Sep 2012
#81
So according to the constitution no religious test is required for public office.
Initech
Sep 2012
#65
And to think a remark about brainwashing sank his father's campaign
muriel_volestrangler
Sep 2012
#77