Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FarLeftFist

(6,161 posts)
22. True, for a group who believes itself to be "individuals" they sure act like cultists.
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 04:53 PM
Jan 2012

Funny how all that "Liberty" eventually leads to paranoia which in turn leads to a militant police state. Libertarianism imploded.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

the vendetta continues Enrique Jan 2012 #1
That was ProSense Jan 2012 #2
i liked it Enrique Jan 2012 #13
Interesting ProSense Jan 2012 #16
Ah, Libertarianism... FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #18
And just think ProSense Jan 2012 #20
True, for a group who believes itself to be "individuals" they sure act like cultists. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #22
ah namecalling Enrique Jan 2012 #23
Feel free to apologize for misrepresenting my post at any time. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #25
You say, "Correct those who stray?" JackRiddler Jan 2012 #33
Maybe you could address the Atlantic article's concerns about the growing "Defense" Security State villager Jan 2012 #3
Here ProSense Jan 2012 #6
again -- a blue link in lieu of actual discussion about *Obama's* policies villager Jan 2012 #12
Well ProSense Jan 2012 #15
You insist on attacking Paul, in order to attack Greenwald, while avoiding *Obama* villager Jan 2012 #17
Wait ProSense Jan 2012 #19
Well, you criticize Greenwald no matter what. Your current link obsession is just the latest. villager Jan 2012 #24
Am ProSense Jan 2012 #26
You criticize Greenwald because he raises uneasy questions about Obama policy. villager Jan 2012 #34
Well, ProSense Jan 2012 #40
I just posted an excerpt from the article in the OP. You're the one that's not discussing it. villager Jan 2012 #41
Hmmm? ProSense Jan 2012 #44
Um, so you refuse to discuss the other assaults against the 4th amendment villager Jan 2012 #45
Instead ProSense Jan 2012 #47
"The blatant attempt at obfuscation!?" Like your OP, you mean? villager Jan 2012 #48
Maybe ProSense Jan 2012 #50
When you address post #34 - directly - we'll talk. villager Jan 2012 #53
Well, ProSense Jan 2012 #59
Cited it, yes. Addressed it, no. villager Jan 2012 #68
" Seriously, do you think red herrings and strawmen arguments work? " girl gone mad Jan 2012 #51
Careful there. Good citizens don't have opinions about the NDAA. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #38
yet when obama praised reagan, you argued vehemently that he didn't praise reagan.. frylock Jan 2012 #4
Are ProSense Jan 2012 #9
does it state that paul should be the frontrunner? frylock Jan 2012 #35
When Obama extended (routinely) the perpetual war budget... JackRiddler Jan 2012 #39
Obama extended it to 4% of GDP. OnyxCollie Jan 2012 #70
For allegedly not promoting Paul, Greenwald sure does a lot of promoting Paul. AtomicKitten Jan 2012 #5
According ProSense Jan 2012 #14
It will make little difference unless Paul runs third party. AtomicKitten Jan 2012 #21
I once linked to a DU post that linked to a website that linked to Free Republic which linked to... Cali_Democrat Jan 2012 #7
Interesting, ProSense Jan 2012 #8
I don't agree with Wendy Kaminer's analysis. n/t Cali_Democrat Jan 2012 #10
I ProSense Jan 2012 #11
Keep it up Pro--- trumad Jan 2012 #27
are you now, or have you ever been a supporter of ron paul? frylock Jan 2012 #69
She Seems like she has decided to redifine civil liberties as those defined by Libertarian Party pschoeb Jan 2012 #29
Exactly, ProSense Jan 2012 #32
Greenwald essentially claims to not be a Ron Paul supporter in this article: Cali_Democrat Jan 2012 #46
You seem to be around 24/7 here. Curious. ClassWarrior Jan 2012 #28
That's ProSense Jan 2012 #30
Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #31
Seems this Greenwald cat kctim Jan 2012 #36
Greenwald is a total idiot surfdog Jan 2012 #37
That isn't Greenwald's piece in the OP. It was written by Wendy Kaminer. Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #42
Let me give you some expert advice. MineralMan Jan 2012 #43
The questions you should be asking your self is, does some of Paul's views Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #49
Well put, Uncle Joe villager Jan 2012 #52
See, ProSense Jan 2012 #56
I said some of his views, not all of them, ie; the corruptive, counterproductive, racist Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #57
What do you think of Obama's vile and racist war on drugs? girl gone mad Jan 2012 #58
It ProSense Jan 2012 #62
You did not answer the question. girl gone mad Jan 2012 #63
Sure ProSense Jan 2012 #64
Too bad the previous bill co-sponsored by Kucinich and Paul didn't pass... Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #65
Apparently that appeals to Greenwald and certain other "Progressives" Son of Gob Jan 2012 #61
Apparently. n/t ProSense Jan 2012 #67
Our daily five minutes of hate expand... nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #54
Hmmm? ProSense Jan 2012 #55
Voters who care about liberty quaker bill Jan 2012 #60
where to start? arely staircase Jan 2012 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Greenwald links to pieces...»Reply #22