General Discussion

treestar

(82,383 posts)

5. Willard is always in the process of giving them back!

Sat Sep 29, 2012, 02:56 PM

Sep 2012

He never holds them but for a second. So the baby is just being handed around.

Conversely President Obama holds them a while or plays with them a little. I recall the one with the little guy who was really happy, thrashing his legs about while the President held him up!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why do babies go all stiff as soon as Willard touches them? [View all] SmileyRose Sep 2012 OP

It's the way he's holding them warrior1 Sep 2012 #1

You know, that was my first thought. AllenVanAllen Sep 2012 #19

his energy is bad. they know such things roguevalley Sep 2012 #36

The Curse of the Undead pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #2

LOL tridim Sep 2012 #3

He is holding them at arms length Generic Other Sep 2012 #4

No... His magic underwear is repelling the kid LiberalFighter Sep 2012 #7

Willard is always in the process of giving them back! treestar Sep 2012 #5

very true, you don't see pics where he and a baby are looking each other in the eye and Voice for Peace Sep 2012 #30

at least they aren't screaming magical thyme Sep 2012 #6

babies can see what we cannot Heather MC Sep 2012 #13

because they don't like cindyperry2010 Sep 2012 #8

Romney is more than thirty thousand years old. randome Sep 2012 #9

They sense his hunger and smell other babies on his breath. n/t porphyrian Sep 2012 #10

Now there you go, doing exactly what you tell others not to do! CrispyQ Sep 2012 #20

Damn! You're right, sorry. It's contagious. porphyrian Sep 2012 #25

Heh. That reminds me of the old joke about how you can tell if Godzilla is tblue37 Sep 2012 #43

Ha! n/t porphyrian Sep 2012 #44

The second one looks like he is swinging him around and around.... WCGreen Sep 2012 #11

He treats them like objects, not precious, vulnerable, amazing little people. nolabear Sep 2012 #12

They think he's about to launch them into space? GoCubsGo Sep 2012 #14

He's a rethuglican. He radiates an aura of evil. lpbk2713 Sep 2012 #15

LOL! onestepforward Sep 2012 #16

terrified he'll pull some "prank" flamingdem Sep 2012 #17

Because they can tell he is uncomfortable from the way he holds them JI7 Sep 2012 #18

Because he holds them like a bazooka? n/t Blaukraut Sep 2012 #21

They heard what happened to poor widdle Bobby... pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #22

Because babies are excellent judges of character. Brigid Sep 2012 #23

Because if they pretend to have rigor mortis he'll eat a fresher baby? n/t gkhouston Sep 2012 #24

!!! polly7 Sep 2012 #46

The babies are trying not to fall forward. lunatica Sep 2012 #26

You know, you're right. gkhouston Sep 2012 #39

Because babies can tell when the person holding them has no soul. craigmatic Sep 2012 #27

The President holds children close. He clearly cherishes them. Romney, on the other hand ... 11 Bravo Sep 2012 #28

You can tell which one had nannies for the kids and which one changed diapers and got puked on. n/t gkhouston Sep 2012 #34

he is spreading his own stiffness MFM008 Sep 2012 #29

He's sucking out their lifeforce? ElboRuum Sep 2012 #31

He's the opposite of King Midas. Everything he touches turns to shit. Initech Sep 2012 #32

Peed my pants just now. kaiden Sep 2012 #33

That's just bizarre. Bobbie Jo Sep 2012 #35

instinctual self preservation? ecstatic Sep 2012 #37

Because all babies can sense the future when they touch somebody. Like in the Dead Zone. Poll_Blind Sep 2012 #38

Mitwit makes babies cry. L0oniX Sep 2012 #40

And then he makes them pay for it... pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #41

Mitwit is a baby thrower! L0oniX Sep 2012 #42

Simples... Turborama Sep 2012 #45

ROFL!!!! Looks like he's trying to launch them!?? ailsagirl Sep 2012 #47

it's like he is Handling them more than Holding them JI7 Sep 2012 #48