Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,261 posts)
15. Here's the order from Courtlistener.
Tue Oct 27, 2020, 11:33 PM
Oct 2020

MINUTE ORDER granting emergency motion to enforce and monitor compliance with preliminary injunction. It is hereby ORDERED that by no later than 9:00 AM on October 28, 2020, Defendants shall issue a one-page notice to Area Vice Presidents, Managers of Operations Support, and any other United States Postal Service "USPS" personnel who were previously informed about the guidelines issued on July 14, 2020, by USPS Vice President of Logistics, Robert Cintron, regarding the use of late and extra trips: (1) "The guidelines issued on July 14, 2020, by USPS Vice President of Logistics, Robert Cintron, regarding the use of late and extra trips are rescinded;" and (2) USPS personnel are instructed to perform late and extra trips to the maximum extent necessary to increase on-time mail deliveries, particularly for Election Mail. To be clear, late and extra trips should be performed to the same or greater degree than they were performed prior to July 2020 when doing so would increase on-time mail deliveries. Any prior communication that is inconsistent with this instruction should be disregarded." It is FURTHER ORDERED that by no later than 9:00 AM on October 29, 2020, Defendants shall issue a one-page notice to, or deliver a Stand-Up Talk to, all USPS personnel who may have job responsibilities related in any way to late and extra trips, stating that: "Late and extra trips will be approved to the maximum extent necessary to increase on-time mail deliveries, particularly for Election Mail. Any prior communication that is inconsistent with this should be disregarded. To be clear, late and extra trips will be approved to the same or greater degree than they were performed prior to July 2020 when doing so would increase on-time mail deliveries." It is FURTHER ORDERED that by no later than 9:00 AM on October 29, 2020, Defendants shall distribute, in the same form and to the same individuals who were previously advised about the need to "ensure that completed ballots reach the appropriate election official by the state's designated deadline," a list of state-specific statutory ballot receipt deadlines, so that USPS managers and employees can implement the Election Mail guidance that Defendants have recently issued. The parties shall confer and agree on the form and substance of the list. It is FURTHER ORDERED that beginning October 28, 2020 and until further order of the Court, Defendants shall file with the Court by 10:00 AM each day: (1) updated data on the number of extra and late trips performed the preceding day, at the Nation, Area, and District level, including any available data that is specific to Election Mail, to the maximum extent feasible; (2) updated data on the percentage of on-time deliveries at the Nation, Area, and District level, including any available data that is specific to Election Mail to the maximum extent feasible; and (3) any other reports generated after the date of this Order and produced to Congress, other courts, or other litigants. It is FURTHER ORDERED that beginning October 28, 2020 and until further order of the Court, the Court schedules a daily status conference at 3:00 PM via VIDEO TELECONFERENCE. The parties shall contact Mr. Mark Coates, the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, for the dial-in information. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 10/27/2020. (lcegs3)

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17461792/national-association-for-the-advancement-of-colored-people-v-united-states/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Love Judge Sullivan Nevilledog Oct 2020 #1
When I read the name, Emmet Sullivan - I said the same thing liberalla Oct 2020 #2
The entire White House must hate that man by now lol!! Volaris Oct 2020 #18
Well, the article goes on to say SheltieLover Oct 2020 #3
Nice! soothsayer Oct 2020 #4
Ikr? SheltieLover Oct 2020 #5
Regardless I would encourage folks to stop putting their ballot in the mail Tom Rivers Oct 2020 #6
I believe some states require the ballots be mailed. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2020 #12
Yup, TN is one of them. SheltieLover Oct 2020 #13
Agree, don't know why any Dem voter would use mail-in radius777 Oct 2020 #19
That's assuming you live in a state that has authorized drop-boxes, PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2020 #22
What if the USPS ignores the orders? What happens? triron Oct 2020 #7
Susan Collins Mr.Bill Oct 2020 #8
Who is going to enforce it? The USPS has so far mainly ignored all the other court orders. scarletwoman Oct 2020 #9
NOBODY......Instead of enforcing this ruling our esteemed AG will go to bat for the defendants. groundloop Oct 2020 #11
Will the new SC find it unconstitutional? Crunchy Frog Oct 2020 #10
K AND R and yuiyoshida Oct 2020 #14
Here's the order from Courtlistener. pnwmom Oct 2020 #15
Thankfully. BobTheSubgenius Oct 2020 #16
No one should be mailing in ballots this late BainsBane Oct 2020 #17
Yes, Mahalo, Judge Emmet Sullivan! Cha Oct 2020 #20
Who's going to enforce compliance? Duppers Oct 2020 #21
K&R Blue Owl Oct 2020 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge imposes sweeping or...»Reply #15