Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Emperor's New Hump (The New York Times killed a story that could have changed the W election) [View all]Turbineguy
(40,048 posts)17. We can expect
Romney to cheat too. But there should be devices out there able to detect these things.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Emperor's New Hump (The New York Times killed a story that could have changed the W election) [View all]
Omaha Steve
Sep 2012
OP
I HAVE googled it and what I see supports what the article says: Printed as conspiracy theory
Th1onein
Oct 2012
#92
It appeared on "several" (ok?) newspaper sites and blog sites. This 2005 article is nothing new:
George II
Oct 2012
#98
I certainly remember that photo! We were all talking about that right here at the time...
Rhiannon12866
Oct 2012
#103
LOL!..I was thinking the same thing. "Put the wrench in the bunny's soup and click your doorbell"
BlueJazz
Sep 2012
#49
But Romney probably won't listen, cuz he's gotta be the man in charge nt
freedom fighter jh
Sep 2012
#22
Just like the NY Times refused to run the story of bush/Cheney and their wiretaps
Botany
Sep 2012
#9
I've wondered if Kerry messed up the wiring at the beginning of the first debate.
yardwork
Sep 2012
#11
Killing a well-investigated article about Bush cheating, because it could change the election!
Overseas
Sep 2012
#12
Journalists already give Rmoney & Lyan too much deference. Pretending they are not lying and are not
Overseas
Sep 2012
#43
Just keeps getting harder to use the word "journalist" when talking about corporate media. nt
raouldukelives
Oct 2012
#78
The confirmation for me was when he blurted out "Let me finish!" in the middle of his answer
NYC Liberal
Sep 2012
#13
"As the politics change, his positions change, and that's not how a Commander in Chief acts."
tarheelsunc
Sep 2012
#47
If they knew what kind of device Romney would be using, could they interfere with it somehow?
OregonBlue
Sep 2012
#31
The NYT will never see another penny from me (nor will I perforce be shopping at any
coalition_unwilling
Sep 2012
#56
"Eat it, America. We Repubbies totally screwed you. Smirk." - George AWOL Bush (R - 1%)
Berlum
Sep 2012
#41
Didn't someone have a pic of Romney wearing one of these for his Univision interview?
tarheelsunc
Sep 2012
#44
The home of War Careerist Judith Miller LIED about the Iraq War, by omission, and then LIES again
patrice
Sep 2012
#57
I've always been startled that the story just totally died after the election...
jimlup
Sep 2012
#61
Why isnt the Democratic Party interested in this? It never fails to amaze me that when cheating
rhett o rick
Sep 2012
#62
Because the Dem vs Rep thing is all just a game of "good cop - bad cop". Welcome to Corporate
kath
Oct 2012
#66
links from the rabbit hole ...as we discussed it back then (extra long link but it works)
SoCalDem
Oct 2012
#69
Well, waddaya know? All of us kooky, out there conspiracy theroists were right after all.
Downtown Hound
Oct 2012
#89