Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: At U.N., Muslim world questions Western freedom of speech [View all]jsr
(7,712 posts)49. This Turkish foreign minister is an Islamist jackass
"Religion is a matter of conscience. One is always free to act according to the will of one's conscience. We (as a nation) are respectful of religion. It is not our intention to curtail freedom of worship, but rather to ensure that matters of religion and those of the state do not become intertwined." - Atatürk
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
138 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perhaps it's the Muslim leaders who are hiding behind "cultural sensitivities"
Recovered Repug
Sep 2012
#4
Middle eastern Islamic nations are at the forefront of suppression of freedom.
Dawson Leery
Sep 2012
#38
Well, historically the muslim world was more tolerant than the christian one..
X_Digger
Oct 2012
#116
Sorry, but we see too many exiled Christians and Jews from Muslim countries in LA.
JDPriestly
Oct 2012
#117
But the Jews have been the victims always -- whether the persecution was by Muslims or by Christians
JDPriestly
Oct 2012
#132
Please the subject line see post #10. I was not talking in particular about the USA.
bemildred
Sep 2012
#12
It is precisely because Europe has such laws that they must be the referent of the speakers.
bemildred
Sep 2012
#21
"you underestimate Mr. Morsi at your peril, he is no loudmouth lightweight"
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2012
#31
Absolutely, they should respect other religions, why would you expect an exception for them?
bemildred
Sep 2012
#18
How's about bashing most major religions for their attitudes towards homosexuality?
dkf
Sep 2012
#30
By bashing, you mean criticizing, right? Ideas NEED to be criticized, and religion is just an idea.
cleanhippie
Oct 2012
#102
Something tells me you don't like religion much. That's not an argument I want the other side of.
bemildred
Oct 2012
#110
The problem is you equate "bashing", "criticizing", "blasphemy" etc. with infringement...
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2012
#118
The point is it's none of your business unless they are violating somebodies rights,
bemildred
Oct 2012
#123
That would depend on what "it" is, wouldn't it? And that would be your opinion, wouldn't it?
bemildred
Oct 2012
#137
The subject line in post #10 says "The usual AMERICAN narcissism I see..."
cherokeeprogressive
Sep 2012
#45
Trust me. Many Muslims bash Christianity too. They won't admit it, but they feel their religion
JDPriestly
Oct 2012
#81
I agree. (Although that boundary is not always sharp, and people will mix the two.)
bemildred
Oct 2012
#99
People don't have a right to not be offended, and relying on intent is foolhardy...
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2012
#120
Yes I'm sure, why free speech is so difficult a concept for you to grasp I will never understand.
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2012
#135
If they ally with out local Christian extremists... I'm not so sure anymore.
2ndAmForComputers
Sep 2012
#22
One of the major war crimes of the last century, and that's saying something.
WinkyDink
Sep 2012
#56
Meanwhile, the Western World questions Muslimn world's treatment of women. (Mine does, anyway.)
WinkyDink
Sep 2012
#54
So, after seeing these threads every day for two weeks now, I have one question.
Scootaloo
Sep 2012
#55
id say that if he was covered by the 1st amendment then he could as long as he didnt advocate violen
loli phabay
Oct 2012
#85
lol i got a feeling that this is a set up, as i said he can say what he likes but i think hes a nut
loli phabay
Oct 2012
#88
You claim to be fighting against hypocrisy and bigotry, but you aren't.
Behind the Aegis
Oct 2012
#78
i think the video is not about dehumanizing people its taking the piss out of their religion
loli phabay
Oct 2012
#86
and you know i probuably wouldnt like his movie and think hes a prick, but im not going to shut him
loli phabay
Oct 2012
#90
My right to free speech guarantees that I can criticize homophobes, Holocaust deniers, racists,
JDPriestly
Oct 2012
#82
Probably has a lot to do with the fact that Mr. Irving doesn't kill people.
NutmegYankee
Oct 2012
#112
You don't seem to get it. Saying I support the First Amendment is a blanket statement.
cherokeeprogressive
Sep 2012
#67
When they allow women to drive cars alone, vote, talk to strange men and own their own businesses
Vincardog
Sep 2012
#57
They are expressing desired actions to be taken by MY sovereign Government Please do get back to me
Vincardog
Oct 2012
#106