Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Emperor's New Hump (The New York Times killed a story that could have changed the W election) [View all]Historic NY
(39,997 posts)85. Somebody needs to have an electronic frequency generator handy...
it can detect & disrupt.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Emperor's New Hump (The New York Times killed a story that could have changed the W election) [View all]
Omaha Steve
Sep 2012
OP
I HAVE googled it and what I see supports what the article says: Printed as conspiracy theory
Th1onein
Oct 2012
#92
It appeared on "several" (ok?) newspaper sites and blog sites. This 2005 article is nothing new:
George II
Oct 2012
#98
I certainly remember that photo! We were all talking about that right here at the time...
Rhiannon12866
Oct 2012
#103
LOL!..I was thinking the same thing. "Put the wrench in the bunny's soup and click your doorbell"
BlueJazz
Sep 2012
#49
But Romney probably won't listen, cuz he's gotta be the man in charge nt
freedom fighter jh
Sep 2012
#22
Just like the NY Times refused to run the story of bush/Cheney and their wiretaps
Botany
Sep 2012
#9
I've wondered if Kerry messed up the wiring at the beginning of the first debate.
yardwork
Sep 2012
#11
Killing a well-investigated article about Bush cheating, because it could change the election!
Overseas
Sep 2012
#12
Journalists already give Rmoney & Lyan too much deference. Pretending they are not lying and are not
Overseas
Sep 2012
#43
Just keeps getting harder to use the word "journalist" when talking about corporate media. nt
raouldukelives
Oct 2012
#78
The confirmation for me was when he blurted out "Let me finish!" in the middle of his answer
NYC Liberal
Sep 2012
#13
"As the politics change, his positions change, and that's not how a Commander in Chief acts."
tarheelsunc
Sep 2012
#47
If they knew what kind of device Romney would be using, could they interfere with it somehow?
OregonBlue
Sep 2012
#31
The NYT will never see another penny from me (nor will I perforce be shopping at any
coalition_unwilling
Sep 2012
#56
"Eat it, America. We Repubbies totally screwed you. Smirk." - George AWOL Bush (R - 1%)
Berlum
Sep 2012
#41
Didn't someone have a pic of Romney wearing one of these for his Univision interview?
tarheelsunc
Sep 2012
#44
The home of War Careerist Judith Miller LIED about the Iraq War, by omission, and then LIES again
patrice
Sep 2012
#57
I've always been startled that the story just totally died after the election...
jimlup
Sep 2012
#61
Why isnt the Democratic Party interested in this? It never fails to amaze me that when cheating
rhett o rick
Sep 2012
#62
Because the Dem vs Rep thing is all just a game of "good cop - bad cop". Welcome to Corporate
kath
Oct 2012
#66
links from the rabbit hole ...as we discussed it back then (extra long link but it works)
SoCalDem
Oct 2012
#69
Well, waddaya know? All of us kooky, out there conspiracy theroists were right after all.
Downtown Hound
Oct 2012
#89