Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dawg

(10,777 posts)
16. It would start immediately.
Mon Jan 9, 2012, 07:46 PM
Jan 2012

Right now, they've got the big money donors *and* the media. Take away the big money donors and they still have an advantage, but it will be diminished.

Case in point, all the tea-party whackos would be having a field day with Romney right now if he didn't have so much money to spend on attack ads kicking them back down. That would sew chaos in their ranks, and they might even end up nominating one of the unelectable extremists like Santorum. Of course, I guess someone as rich as Romney could always spend his own money. But right now, he doesn't even have to do that. The rest of the Wall Street fatcats pay his way for him.

We can't take away Rush Limbaugh's first amendment right to have his say. But we can keep people from purchasing the government outright. Money does not equal free speech.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Suppose we took all the m...»Reply #16