Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(3,249 posts)

17. No, it's not immaterial. How many "major candidates" .....

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 07:54 PM

Jan 2012

... can there be? Will there be? How do you limit the number and decide who gets what? How do you enforce it? C'mon, man, think this through.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

break up clear channel. Vincardog Jan 2012 #1

FOX news? NNN0LHI Jan 2012 #2

Who decides who is a "major" candidate? SixthSense Jan 2012 #4

What defines a "major candidate"? oldhippie Jan 2012 #5

No, it's not immaterial. How many "major candidates" ..... oldhippie Jan 2012 #17

Let everyone give up to $1000 a year to a candidate. dawg Jan 2012 #8

And with the GOP's media advantage Dems will never win an election NNN0LHI Jan 2012 #9

My plan would cripple them. dawg Jan 2012 #11

It would start immediately. dawg Jan 2012 #16

Perhaps you haven't been listening, MadHound Jan 2012 #14