Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

musicblind

(4,563 posts)
6. When it comes to traditional polls, it's getting harder and harder to get a truly random sample.
Sat Nov 7, 2020, 04:53 AM
Nov 2020

The sample self-selects in one way or another. Certain people answer phones, and certain people don't. A lot of online polling is opt-in first, and then those sampled are randomly chosen from the opt-in pool.

But, especially when it comes to political polling, people lie. Unlike most posters, I don't think people systemically lie on purpose. I think people believe the lie in the moment, but it still ends up being untrue.

An example:

Polling used to show 1.8% of the population was gay. As a gay man who worked extensively within the gay community, I knew that was B.S. — Then, polls showed 3% — Then, 4.5% — Now there are polls showing 8% to 15% depending on the age group.

People didn't become more gay; people became more willing to admit it—both to pollsters and to themselves.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Exit Polls can be just as...»Reply #6