Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rocktivity

(45,006 posts)

5. They should have stood with Perry, then. Seriously.

Reply to Skidmore (Original post)

Mon Jan 9, 2012, 08:20 PM

Jan 2012

He wouldn't have beaten Obama, of course -- Perry makes Bush seem lucid. But before Bachmann was sicced on him, he was popular with the voters. They resent being force-fed Romney so much that Santorum (who makes Perry seem lucid) got an equal number of votes in NH.

rocktivity

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hmmm. It has crossed my mind that the Rs are kneecapping Willard [View all] Skidmore Jan 2012 OP

Knives! Get your sharp knives! Knives for sale! izquierdista Jan 2012 #1

Pardon me, but which one is Willard? And isn't Huntsman their stealth candidate? freshwest Jan 2012 #2

Willard Mitt Romney. Rev. Al always refers to him as Willard Mitt. I love it..n/t monmouth Jan 2012 #4

Hey, thanks. I don't do TV, so I miss some of these references. freshwest Jan 2012 #6

They realize they aren't going to win no matter who they run against Obama NNN0LHI Jan 2012 #3

They should have stood with Perry, then. Seriously. rocktivity Jan 2012 #5

IMO they have not touched on the real issue with Mitt Motown_Johnny Jan 2012 #7

What about Bush and McCain in 2000? eom tledford Jan 2012 #8

Jeb and Cindy? rocktivity Jan 2012 #9

I think they really hate each other. bemildred Jan 2012 #10