Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Confusious

(8,317 posts)
58. The exchange of printed money doesn't make capitalism
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 11:52 AM
Oct 2012
"Kind of like modern humans haven't always existed. But you seem to say they have."

No, I don't seem to say that at all.

"You're calling chimpanzees human"

Nope, I have never ever in my whole life called chimpanzees human.


Again, it's called an analogy.

From the perspective of the German Historical School, capitalism is primarily identified in terms of the organization of production for markets. Although this perspective shares similar theoretical roots with that of Weber, its emphasis on markets and money lends it different focus.[34] For followers of the German Historical School, the key shift from traditional modes of economic activity to capitalism involved the shift from medieval restrictions on credit and money to the modern monetary economy combined with an emphasis on the profit motive.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism#Free-market_capitalism

In social science, the understanding of the defining characteristics of capitalism has been strongly influenced by German sociologist Max Weber. Weber considered market exchange, a voluntary supply of labor and a planned division of labor within the entreprises as defining features of capitalism


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism#Free-market_capitalism

Division of labour is the specialization of cooperative labour in specific, circumscribed tasks and like roles. Historically an increasingly complex division of labour is closely associated with the growth of total output and trade, the rise of capitalism, and of the complexity of industrialisation processes.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_labour

Of course:

Division of labour was also a method used by the Sumerians to categorise different jobs, and divide them to skilled members of a society.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_labour

But it wasn't capitalism.

Bad comparision Confusious Sep 2012 #1
Natalie is a woman Turborama Sep 2012 #2
Of course it's not literal Confusious Sep 2012 #6
An example of a technology that has been relegated to being a historical artifact Turborama Sep 2012 #8
I usually don't read Luddite screeds Confusious Sep 2012 #11
I don't usually reply to posters who only comment on post titles Turborama Sep 2012 #14
Luddites Confusious Sep 2012 #15
Right, so essentially: "I throw ad hominem attacks at writers who's work I don't read" Turborama Oct 2012 #16
Urban dictionary? Confusious Oct 2012 #22
Winners write history tama Oct 2012 #23
I used the laughing icon to express my amusement Confusious Oct 2012 #26
You've got some cheek with your hypocritical accusations Turborama Oct 2012 #33
Three people have agreed with me so far on the betamax term Confusious Oct 2012 #38
Just asking tama Oct 2012 #41
Answer Confusious Oct 2012 #45
I don't agree with either Marx of Ogilvie nt. tama Oct 2012 #47
LOL! So, if 3 people agree with Donald Trump that makes him correct about the President's BC? Turborama Oct 2012 #46
You seem to have a hard time understanding me Confusious Oct 2012 #49
Hey, Confusion, take a deep breath and read what I wrote again... Turborama Oct 2012 #55
I actually looked at the article and it was what I expected Confusious Oct 2012 #56
Wow, not only are you moving the goalposts... Turborama Oct 2012 #62
So let me get this straight Confusious Oct 2012 #64
Peasants are working class tama Oct 2012 #66
Didn't I say Confusious Oct 2012 #67
Yes you did tama Oct 2012 #71
Luddites were part of the guild system Confusious Oct 2012 #72
Guild system can be criticized for some things tama Oct 2012 #82
So we should go back to the barter system? Confusious Oct 2012 #83
I like gift economy best tama Oct 2012 #87
Would everyone? Confusious Oct 2012 #92
Maybe so tama Oct 2012 #94
Luddites are socialists tama Oct 2012 #18
HAHA Confusious Oct 2012 #20
People who live it tama Oct 2012 #24
You know someone who was alive from 1812? Confusious Oct 2012 #27
Yes, like marxism. tama Oct 2012 #29
You seem to think having a small part of something Confusious Oct 2012 #30
As you say tama Oct 2012 #31
So is english a second language for you? Confusious Oct 2012 #39
To answer your questions tama Oct 2012 #42
Well, if you would speak english, we could Confusious Oct 2012 #44
Defense mechanisms tama Oct 2012 #48
secundary or secondary? Confusious Oct 2012 #50
Secondary tama Oct 2012 #53
I might disagree what belongs in what category Confusious Oct 2012 #54
Very good tama Oct 2012 #59
Like I said uranium mining is no different then any other mining Confusious Oct 2012 #60
A current example hereabouts tama Oct 2012 #61
That's a nickel mine Confusious Oct 2012 #63
Should and should tama Oct 2012 #65
Do you things things like this should never be done Confusious Oct 2012 #68
No we don't tama Oct 2012 #70
You can't get away from money Confusious Oct 2012 #73
Of course you can get away from money tama Oct 2012 #77
A few people can get away from money Confusious Oct 2012 #79
What is fantasy tama Oct 2012 #81
"Working for money" is primarily a psychological issue. Confusious Oct 2012 #85
Anarchy tama Oct 2012 #88
Communties Confusious Oct 2012 #91
Networks of communities tama Oct 2012 #93
Beta is actually still an industry standard in TV broadcasting n/t BarackTheVote Oct 2012 #28
It fits her purpose, since she is bashing obsession with new technologies. bemildred Sep 2012 #4
Which ones shouldn't? Confusious Sep 2012 #5
Nukes come to mind immediately, various weapons systems, thalidomide. bemildred Sep 2012 #9
It doesn't require education or experience Confusious Sep 2012 #10
Where do you think we should have stopped? the transistor? the electron tube? Zorra Sep 2012 #12
Luddite? Nt Confusious Sep 2012 #13
What do you know about luddites? tama Oct 2012 #19
Again Confusious Oct 2012 #21
Following that "logic"... Turborama Oct 2012 #34
Really? You're going to go with that nonlogic? Confusious Oct 2012 #37
Yet another logic fail, how embarrassing for you! Turborama Oct 2012 #40
No, the theory hasn't existed for millennia Confusious Oct 2012 #43
Looks like you've got some reading to do... Turborama Oct 2012 #51
Jesus Confusious Oct 2012 #52
Something else I wrote you need to read again... Turborama Oct 2012 #57
The exchange of printed money doesn't make capitalism Confusious Oct 2012 #58
Same shit, different names tama Oct 2012 #69
Division of labor in manfacturing Confusious Oct 2012 #74
That's the origin of the Greek word tama Oct 2012 #78
I always like how you ignore things you don't like Confusious Oct 2012 #80
It's not ignoring tama Oct 2012 #84
Social mobility Confusious Oct 2012 #86
I don't believe so tama Oct 2012 #89
You should believe so Confusious Oct 2012 #90
I thought the same thing when I read it -- superior performance undercut by cheaper and crappier Brickbat Oct 2012 #17
That was my first thought too after seeing the headline NT Serve The Servants Oct 2012 #32
That was my thought too 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #75
Yea I thought of the Hindenberg and airplanes too. nt Confusious Oct 2012 #76
K&R But that was a very bad analogy. The leader of a political party really needs to be more Egalitarian Thug Sep 2012 #3
Maybe she took a holiday in Germany green for victory Sep 2012 #7
Thank you Turborama Oct 2012 #35
Well, I've never known of anyone dying from cancer, sick with thyroid or prostate disease.. Tikki Oct 2012 #25
She's lost already Hutzpa Oct 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Leader Of UK's Green ...»Reply #58