Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopdiggin

(15,595 posts)
28. that is not at all what the Supreme Court said
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 02:16 PM
Nov 2020

States have always had the determination of electors in their hands. Currently they are almost universal in awarding those votes in a "winner take all" block (selected by the political parties) on the basis of the popular vote. They can chose other ways of of doing it (and two states have done so, ME and NE) by changing their own respective state laws. And they have always had that ability.

The court has also ruled unanimously in favor of "faithless elector" state laws -

-- snip -- NYTimes, updated Nov. 3, 2020 --
“The Constitution’s text and the nation’s history both support allowing a state to enforce an elector’s pledge to support his party’s nominee — and the state voters’ choice — for president,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote for seven members of the court.

i.e. they DO have to vote the way they are assigned -- and are subject to penalty by state law for infraction -- per the Supreme Court

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It goes to the house 269-269 madaboutharry Nov 2020 #1
No..it goes to the house...One vote from each state. LeftInTX Nov 2020 #5
Yes. and it isn't a tie. Biden/Harris at the worst will get 290 electoral votes still_one Nov 2020 #9
The results are too clear. They won't have the nerve to do it. RDANGELO Nov 2020 #2
Nerve to do it, you mean NJCher Nov 2020 #4
They would not get away with it. It would be civil war. Crunchy Frog Nov 2020 #8
100% agree. OnDoutside Nov 2020 #12
Chill. PTWB Nov 2020 #3
But McConnell is evil LeftInTX Nov 2020 #6
I still don't think they want to go the win at all costs route. Renew Deal Nov 2020 #7
McConell wants to break it. LeftInTX Nov 2020 #11
Not to worry... Sogo Nov 2020 #10
I am SO FUCKING TIRED renate Nov 2020 #13
none of this wild-assed stuff is actually going to happen stopdiggin Nov 2020 #18
Thank you! I needed this splash of cold water to the face renate Nov 2020 #23
No. Here's the procedure for challenging electoral votes: unblock Nov 2020 #14
Thank-you. Thank god we have the majority in the House still_one Nov 2020 #15
thank you! LeftInTX Nov 2020 #21
We have such a fucking dumbass system. nt coti Nov 2020 #24
Wow. That means if Republicans held both majorities they could block an election. Kablooie Nov 2020 #25
NO. (nt) stopdiggin Nov 2020 #16
I'm not worried. I don't think even they are that brazen to pull this type of Jspur Nov 2020 #17
Umm, no. PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2020 #19
EC IS THE DEFINITION OF INSANITY, BUT.... pbmus Nov 2020 #20
I think... Mike Nelson Nov 2020 #22
I'd be making it quite clear there are several GOP Sens. that need investigating by the DOJ and FBI sunonmars Nov 2020 #26
what pisses me off is the supreme court ruled the electoral college could be bribed mucifer Nov 2020 #27
that is not at all what the Supreme Court said stopdiggin Nov 2020 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Good Gawd - Can the Senat...»Reply #28