Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

struggle4progress

(126,327 posts)
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 12:51 PM Oct 2012

Police stakeout bill for Assange tops £1m as it costs £11,000 a DAY to ensure he doesn't flee ... [View all]

Ecuadorian Embassy
At least four Met officers stand guard around the clock
William Hague admits there is 'no sign of breakthrough'
By Chris Greenwood, Crime Reporter
PUBLISHED: 19:34 EST, 1 October 2012 | UPDATED: 04:51 EST, 2 October 2012

The police bill for staking out the embassy where WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is evading justice has already reached more than £1million. Scotland Yard confirmed it is costing £11,000 every day to ensure the Australian does not flee his bolthole at the Ecuadorean Embassy ...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2211530/Police-stakeout-Assange-tops-1m-costs-11-000-DAY-ensure-doesnt-flee-Ecuadorian-Embassy.html?ito=feeds-newsxml


Sentencing Guidelines Council
Fail to Surrender to Bail

... Bail Act offences are committed in significant numbers each year and are a major cause of disruption, delay and unnecessary cost for the criminal justice system ... When a Bail Act offence has been committed, the sentence must be commensurate with the seriousness of the offence and must take into account both the reason why the offender failed to surrender and the degree of harm intended or caused. For these purposes, ‘harm’ is not only that caused to individual victims and witnesses but includes the consequential effect on police and court resources and the wider negative impact on public confidence in the criminal justice system ... Section 6 of the Bail Act 1976 states:
“1) If a person who has been released on bail in criminal proceedings fails without reasonable cause to surrender to custody he shall be guilty of an offence; and
2) If a person who:
(a) has been released on bail in criminal proceedings, and
(b) having reasonable cause therefor, has failed to surrender to custody, fails to surrender to custody at the appointed place as soon after the appointed time as is reasonably practicable, he shall be guilty of an offence.”
The maximum sentence in a magistrates’ court is 3 months imprisonment. If the matter is committed to the Crown Court for sentence, or dealt with there, the maximum sentence is 12 months custody ... The obligation on a person who is granted bail is to surrender to custody at the court or the police station as required ... Where the failure to surrender was deliberate, it will be relevant whether it was designed to disrupt the system to the defendant’s advantage ... Seriousness is not reduced automatically by subsequent acquittal of the original offence ... The period of time for which a defendant absconds is also likely to influence the court when considering sentence ... The following aggravating factors are particularly relevant to an offence of failing to surrender to bail:
... Offender’s absence causes a lengthy delay to the administration of justice
... Determined attempt to avoid the jurisdiction of the court ...
Surrender initiated by the offender merits consideration as a mitigating factor ... Where the failure to surrender to custody was ‘deliberate’ ... at or near the top of the range will be cases where any of aggravating factors ... are present if there is also a significant delay and/or interference with the progress of the case ...

<link to pdf:> http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/docs/web_Fail_to_Surrender_to_Bail.pdf
51 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DU rec...nt SidDithers Oct 2012 #1
x2 Tarheel_Dem Oct 2012 #3
Their fault for wasting money. nt Comrade_McKenzie Oct 2012 #2
I call bs on this dsc Oct 2012 #4
It's probably an average since he jumped bail struggle4progress Oct 2012 #9
Well lets look at it this way dsc Oct 2012 #41
There have sometimes been crowds near the embassy: multiple officers may not have been excessive struggle4progress Oct 2012 #42
I still find both of the estimates wildly inflated dsc Oct 2012 #44
They've had quite a few there at times: struggle4progress Oct 2012 #47
It's Britain's choice. And thanks for linking to the Daily Mail again. Comrade Grumpy Oct 2012 #5
I really doubt the Brits are paying that bill. The US is I'd bet. A million bucks already?? riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #8
GOLDSTEIN!!1 frylock Oct 2012 #6
You seem to have a limited vocabulary struggle4progress Oct 2012 #10
Gotta love posters you could replace with a small script of some sort. (nt) Posteritatis Oct 2012 #13
you're replying to a bot.. frylock Oct 2012 #25
that's the only appropriate response your two-minute hate deserves frylock Oct 2012 #22
It's time for Two Minutes Hate! backscatter712 Oct 2012 #26
Wait, whut? I thought Assange was so unimportant to the PTB, so utterly inconsequential anymore riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #7
Assange will do everything he can... NCTraveler Oct 2012 #11
Of course! He's staying in the embassy to...make them spend money to...become more famous! wtmusic Oct 2012 #29
This amount is like 100x what they'd spend on anyone else, including convicted felons! riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #33
I'm sure the U.S. is tossing a Milk-Bone or two their way. nt wtmusic Oct 2012 #40
so will s4p n/t LadyHawkAZ Oct 2012 #30
lol obamanut2012 Oct 2012 #32
That was good. nt. NCTraveler Oct 2012 #51
Yes He Is A Honey Boo Boo Fame Wanker!!!! HangOnKids Oct 2012 #48
Governments are generally willing to expend substantial resources to ensure people take seriously struggle4progress Oct 2012 #14
LOL!!! 4 million pounds/year??? For an indefinite number of years?? For "jumping bail". riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #17
Perhaps they would have spent rather less on a manhunt for him, if he had simply disappeared, but struggle4progress Oct 2012 #19
You're really serious? You think the UK government is spending that much money for an example?? riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #20
Yes: governments generally don't ignore folk who flout the law with much noise and fanfare, struggle4progress Oct 2012 #37
Assange has more guards than #10 Downing St! (which has 3) riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #38
True...if Ecuador built an embassy big enough, they could provide refuge for all Brit bail-jumpers. wtmusic Oct 2012 #31
a manhunt?! frylock Oct 2012 #45
But to the British, thumbing one's nose at their government might be consequential treestar Oct 2012 #21
Boo fucking hoo. Luminous Animal Oct 2012 #12
Being a lapdog for the USA is expensive. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2012 #15
Assange's crackpot claims don't become credible simply by being repeated again and again struggle4progress Oct 2012 #18
s4p's crackpot claims don't become credible simply by being repeated again and again.. frylock Oct 2012 #23
You don't seem to notice Assange's stories change with the fickle winds: struggle4progress Oct 2012 #43
those aren't assange's claims.. frylock Oct 2012 #46
The claims of Assange's lawyers are, of course, to be regarded as the claims of Assange struggle4progress Oct 2012 #50
My sympathies are with the Ecuadorian embassy staff who have to live with Assange and his ego. Nye Bevan Oct 2012 #16
do you spend a lot of time imagining that? frylock Oct 2012 #24
Not really. Nye Bevan Oct 2012 #28
I want Assange to escape in the laundry truck, like in the movies? ~nt 99th_Monkey Oct 2012 #27
I just did the currency converter and this works out to $6.4 million/year!!! riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #34
$6.4M? Shee-it. GliderGuider Oct 2012 #49
Good !!! WillyT Oct 2012 #35
The 1% makes taxpayers foot the bill to make sure Julian can no longer expose their corrupt deeds. Zorra Oct 2012 #36
The money can be saved if Assange steps out for a cup of coffee. nt bluestate10 Oct 2012 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Police stakeout bill for ...