Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's the GSA, deferring to trumplethinskin, that will not acknowledge and approve the transition [View all]Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)33. Those are RW talking points. It's never been held up until electors voted and Congress certified.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's the GSA, deferring to trumplethinskin, that will not acknowledge and approve the transition [View all]
Ninga
Nov 2020
OP
Do you know how many Electoral Votes Biden has right now? The correct answer is "0".
brooklynite
Nov 2020
#35
I could go to Court and claim State Certifications as a standing for EVs...
brooklynite
Nov 2020
#42
it is clear that the fucker only wants to fuck up the Biden administration in any way he can.
Ninga
Nov 2020
#7
Historically, the funds have been released long before the certification
bottomofthehill
Nov 2020
#13
The language of the Act is "apparent President-Elect" I do not think trump is going to
Ninga
Nov 2020
#16
Those are RW talking points. It's never been held up until electors voted and Congress certified.
Hermit-The-Prog
Nov 2020
#33
The Presidential Transition Act of 1963 only talks about the president-elect, it does not
Ninga
Nov 2020
#14
I hear you and fully understand. I do not agree that conceding is required. All of us will
Ninga
Nov 2020
#20
Another broken norm that now needs to be spelled out legally, with real penalties attached.
tblue37
Nov 2020
#12
She sounds like that woman in Kentucky who wouldn't issue marriage licenses because of
Sogo
Nov 2020
#18
The money's already there. WE put it there as taxpayers. RELEASE THE FUNDS YOU POS!
ffr
Nov 2020
#23
Got to make an example of people like this. She deserves to spend many years in prison
Eid Ma Clack Shaw
Nov 2020
#30
