Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's the GSA, deferring to trumplethinskin, that will not acknowledge and approve the transition [View all]jmowreader
(53,042 posts)36. Obstructing official business
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1752
18 USC 1752 (a) (2):
(Whoever) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions...
The penalty is a fine or imprisonment for "not more than one year," or both.
18 USC 1752 (a) (2):
(Whoever) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions...
The penalty is a fine or imprisonment for "not more than one year," or both.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's the GSA, deferring to trumplethinskin, that will not acknowledge and approve the transition [View all]
Ninga
Nov 2020
OP
Do you know how many Electoral Votes Biden has right now? The correct answer is "0".
brooklynite
Nov 2020
#35
I could go to Court and claim State Certifications as a standing for EVs...
brooklynite
Nov 2020
#42
it is clear that the fucker only wants to fuck up the Biden administration in any way he can.
Ninga
Nov 2020
#7
Historically, the funds have been released long before the certification
bottomofthehill
Nov 2020
#13
The language of the Act is "apparent President-Elect" I do not think trump is going to
Ninga
Nov 2020
#16
Those are RW talking points. It's never been held up until electors voted and Congress certified.
Hermit-The-Prog
Nov 2020
#33
The Presidential Transition Act of 1963 only talks about the president-elect, it does not
Ninga
Nov 2020
#14
I hear you and fully understand. I do not agree that conceding is required. All of us will
Ninga
Nov 2020
#20
Another broken norm that now needs to be spelled out legally, with real penalties attached.
tblue37
Nov 2020
#12
She sounds like that woman in Kentucky who wouldn't issue marriage licenses because of
Sogo
Nov 2020
#18
The money's already there. WE put it there as taxpayers. RELEASE THE FUNDS YOU POS!
ffr
Nov 2020
#23
Got to make an example of people like this. She deserves to spend many years in prison
Eid Ma Clack Shaw
Nov 2020
#30