Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Statistical

(19,264 posts)

18. Exactly. The whole thing is BS but that kills it dead as a doornail.

Reply to mzmolly (Reply #3)

Tue Nov 10, 2020, 12:32 AM

Nov 2020

There is no equal protection violation if someone chooses to vote in person instead of by mail. It would be like choosing to have a bench trial not a jury trial and saying your equal protection rights were suppressed because you didn't have a jury trial like other defendants.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump to try to invalidate all mail-in ballots in PA [View all] VMA131Marine Nov 2020 OP

States' rights mean nothing to this clown. 😡 secondwind Nov 2020 #1

The Repukes only want states rights when it suits their corrupt agenda. roamer65 Nov 2020 #8

Translation: madaboutharry Nov 2020 #2

His voters also had access to the mail. mzmolly Nov 2020 #3

+1 Hugin Nov 2020 #17

Exactly. The whole thing is BS but that kills it dead as a doornail. Statistical Nov 2020 #18

Throw in the fact that PA and all States have allowed absentee ballots for decades. Hugin Nov 2020 #19

This ia all a GOP/RNC plan to grift more money from their cult. BigmanPigman Nov 2020 #4

This. They'll withdraw/stop any action before they get to SCOTUS Maru Kitteh Nov 2020 #12

Love your awesome sig pix! Dark n Stormy Knight Nov 2020 #23

Thanks! Joe Biden campaign has a GIPHY account, so many Maru Kitteh Nov 2020 #24

Wow, the drama HariSeldon Nov 2020 #5

Citing Constitutional grounds. Obviously to go to SCOTUS underpants Nov 2020 #6

they can claim Equal Protection all they want. As valid as trump making his claim on wins last week Roland99 Nov 2020 #29

I know but SUPREME COURT is a great fund raiser underpants Nov 2020 #30

ha! Roland99 Nov 2020 #31

So like absentee ballots in all of the other states. Pathetic Rice4VP Nov 2020 #7

States have different methods for validating mail-in ballots VMA131Marine Nov 2020 #10

There are limits. The would-be traitors on SCOTUS aren't likely to pat_k Nov 2020 #9

they can and they will if they get the chance. their loyalty is to der fuhrer nt msongs Nov 2020 #11

I really don't see every Repub refusing to remove the black robbed traitors. . . pat_k Nov 2020 #15

SCOTUS doesn't need Trump anymore. They can save face, and get rid of a problem Progressive Jones Nov 2020 #16

I kind of want to see what he does if it does get to the SC and the ones he picked rule against him JI7 Nov 2020 #13

If SCOTUS is smart VMA131Marine Nov 2020 #14

Yep. I think the absurdity of the claims goes too far. pat_k Nov 2020 #21

They would need twenty GOP senators, not four. Wednesdays Nov 2020 #26

Of course. I'm thinking of simple majority to impeach. My bad. pat_k Nov 2020 #28

Their whole "case" is conjecture. blogslut Nov 2020 #20

I want recounts on the states he won Bayard Nov 2020 #22

This lawsuit has no chance of succeeding- this is the kind of issue you raise beforehand Alhena Nov 2020 #25

Certainly, the timeliness of the suit is going to be an issue VMA131Marine Nov 2020 #27