General Discussion

Bradshaw3

(7,964 posts)

19. Yes we will

Reply to soothsayer (Reply #2)

Tue Nov 10, 2020, 11:51 AM

Nov 2020

In two weeks.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Striking down ACA "is not our job" [View all] brooklynite Nov 2020 OP

wow, I like that! Celerity Nov 2020 #1

But Roberts isn't the 5 SC judges that we worry about. n/t Claustrum Nov 2020 #3

just on general tenor and tone though, it is good to hear Celerity Nov 2020 #10

This is Roberts' court... Spazito Nov 2020 #12

But Roberts and his Court will do what they did before StClone Nov 2020 #39

Possibly and that is the reason to focus on taking control of the Senate... Spazito Nov 2020 #41

I think this is compelling. calimary Nov 2020 #46

Exactly! n/t Spazito Nov 2020 #47

Agreed. DEbluedude Nov 2020 #52

Yep. Good point! It all comes down to MESSAGING. calimary Nov 2020 #57

Kavanaugh said basically the same thing yesterday. marble falls Nov 2020 #56

Now we're never gonna see Drumpf's plan soothsayer Nov 2020 #2

I see what you did there... Wounded Bear Nov 2020 #4

Yes we will Bradshaw3 Nov 2020 #19

It's almost ready SilasSouleII Nov 2020 #33

That binder handed to Stahl was big Bradshaw3 Nov 2020 #40

His health care plan is to kill everyone off with Covid. LaMouffette Nov 2020 #37

Final decision won't be rendered for awhile, but seems obvious remainder of the ACA will remain. Hoyt Nov 2020 #5

a majority has to agree. nt BainsBane Nov 2020 #9

They will. Hoyt Nov 2020 #13

Kavanaugh and Barrett? BainsBane Nov 2020 #14

I actually heard Kavanaugh has a quote which may be agreeable to keeping the ACA DLCWIdem Nov 2020 #16

That's what you were told, but Judges tend to be more deliberative. Hoyt Nov 2020 #21

the mandate is the law BainsBane Nov 2020 #24

The Mandate has been gone and unenforceable for some time. The question is, does the rest of the Hoyt Nov 2020 #25

Yes, for a minute I thought I was reading an old thread:) Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2020 #44

Then why did they put it on the docket? Merlot Nov 2020 #6

Maybe to put it to rest? KatyMan Nov 2020 #7

This case asks to gut the ACA not strike it down in its entirety. Hortensis Nov 2020 #18

Exactly! mountain grammy Nov 2020 #26

Absolutely. I believe there is no valid intellectual basis for the so-called Hortensis Nov 2020 #35

Totally agree! CrispyQ Nov 2020 #38

Well said, and I completely agree.. mountain grammy Nov 2020 #53

Let the record so validate quickly - you know what to do Chief Justice SCROTUS Backseat Driver Nov 2020 #8

Anyone have the Roberts quote? empedocles Nov 2020 #11

Encouraging, but deciding on the constitutionality of the specific issue Hortensis Nov 2020 #15

This is correct. People have a misconception about how the court works. cbdo2007 Nov 2020 #17

Most laws have a section saying that one part being struck down treestar Nov 2020 #43

Listening to the arguments jmbar2 Nov 2020 #20

I'm sure Amy and Brett will beg to differ with him .... world wide wally Nov 2020 #22

Brett has said that striking down part of the ACA does not mean striking down the whole thing. marie999 Nov 2020 #27

We will know soon world wide wally Nov 2020 #30

So do I. marie999 Nov 2020 #31

Kavanaugh makes more sense Eyeball_Kid Nov 2020 #42

I hope President Biden can reverse the fascist waivers allowing states to shut down ACA.gov access. yaesu Nov 2020 #23

SC won't want the Dems to have Healthcare Roc2020 Nov 2020 #28

i'll wait for the decision barbtries Nov 2020 #29

I suspect that what he means is we can disable it without removing it Ford_Prefect Nov 2020 #32

Key Justices Signal Support for Affordable Care Act. elleng Nov 2020 #34

Roberts trying to give a sane decision in order to... joshcryer Nov 2020 #36

don't underestimate the power of covid on their decision AlexSFCA Nov 2020 #45

Ha!! bdamomma Nov 2020 #48

Exactly. Had they wanted to strike it down or amend it they would have. They didn't so case closed. Pepsidog Nov 2020 #49

Ya mean, the Handmaid doesn't get to enable tRump? Blue Owl Nov 2020 #50

And Donny soils his Depends once again Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2020 #51

Maybe some of the judges' relatives torius Nov 2020 #54

The Roberts Court is frequently asked to referee the partisan divide bucolic_frolic Nov 2020 #55

That is an astute observation. BobTheSubgenius Nov 2020 #58