Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,742 posts)
9. No. The case doesn't allege fraud - this was just a nice bonus.
Tue Nov 10, 2020, 11:09 PM
Nov 2020

This is (like most of Trump's cases - bluster aside) an effort to pick off ballots without being required to specifically prove fraud.

The law requires certain formalities for absentee ballots (absent secrecy sleeve, secrecy sleeve that identifies a voter by name or political affiliation, deficiencies in signature or date of the declaration).

So, although the judge asked about allegations of fraud, the case is about whether every cross and dot of the absentee ballot must be complied with (regardless of voter intent).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So is that: Case dismissed? dawg day Nov 2020 #1
No. The case doesn't allege fraud - this was just a nice bonus. Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #9
"Hanging chads," as it were (nt) Orrex Nov 2020 #14
Oopsie. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2020 #2
And, OH, was she SO great!!!! MyOwnPeace Nov 2020 #5
It would be nice if all of these assholes had to make their claims under oath for all to see. tulipsandroses Nov 2020 #3
The courts should fine them $500 per word when the case has no merit. lindysalsagal Nov 2020 #4
The judges should start using Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2020 #7
It helps to go to read the case documents. Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #10
A stupid case without legal or factual merit could still warrant Rule 11 sanctions. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2020 #15
This one doesn't depend on the details - it is a question of whether the law Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #16
This should be in an ad and should be read out every time Democratic lawmakers speak in public. Doodley Nov 2020 #6
Then, what are they alleging? What criminal conducts are they complaining about? Claustrum Nov 2020 #8
It's a civil case - Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #17
Only the judges can save our democracy AmericanCanuck Nov 2020 #11
So... they've got nothing, nada, zilch. RestoreAmerica2020 Nov 2020 #12
If the issue was fraud - yes. But that is not what the suit was about. n/t Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #18
HAHA brettdale Nov 2020 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Today, Pennsylvania judge...»Reply #9