Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rsdsharp

(11,887 posts)

4. I don't think it was under penalty of perjury.

Reply to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Wed Nov 11, 2020, 05:38 PM

Nov 2020

He would be subject to sanction for making a false statement to the court, including fines, and possible license suspension for violation of ethical rules.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump attorney openly admits to judge under penalty of perjury that there's no election fraud [View all] UCmeNdc Nov 2020 OP

I've seen this posted many times today Cirque du So-What Nov 2020 #1

Promised a ruling by the end of the week, possibly tomorrow. n/t jpljr77 Nov 2020 #2

THIS question needs to be asked by bluestarone Nov 2020 #3

I don't think it was under penalty of perjury. rsdsharp Nov 2020 #4

Why don't you think it was under penalty of perjury? Dream Girl Nov 2020 #5

see below. lawyers usually aren't making statements under oath/affirmation. unblock Nov 2020 #7

It was the attorney, not a witness under oath... Thomas Hurt Nov 2020 #8

He wasn't under oath. rsdsharp Nov 2020 #9

right, lawyers make arguments and allegations which they may support with others' evidence. unblock Nov 2020 #6