Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

IsItJustMe

(7,012 posts)

12. Not sure about this

Reply to Roisin Ni Fiachra (Original post)

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 12:08 PM

Nov 2020

Last edited Thu Nov 19, 2020, 12:41 PM - Edit history (1)

I read somewhere that on one of DT's law suits, the Supreme Court was divided on taking up the case, four being in favor, four being against (abstaining from the vote, including Roberts), and Barrett neither abstaining or voting because she said she did not know enough about the case to vote one way or the other. Barrett can change her mind and that case could end up before the SC.

I think it was the case in PA of ballots post marked before the end of the election, but received after the election. We shall see.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Supreme Court is running the clock on Trump's election lawsuits, experts say [View all] Roisin Ni Fiachra Nov 2020 OP

Roberts does seem relatively sane, but you never know anymore Walleye Nov 2020 #1

Roberts got his conservative majority dansolo Nov 2020 #3

Correct. So let's hope logic prevails. Walleye Nov 2020 #6

Wait, what? A conservative majority gives you hope that logic will prevail? Towlie Nov 2020 #8

Only that Roberts follows his own self interest and cuts himself loose from this maniac Walleye Nov 2020 #9

If the Trump Court nullifies the election and gives the traitor another term, then it is time dalton99a Nov 2020 #2

Taxation without representation is tyranny. nt Roisin Ni Fiachra Nov 2020 #4

Precisely. dalton99a Nov 2020 #5

there is NO standing and no reason for SC to interefere with state election outcomes beachbumbob Nov 2020 #7

Exactly..they made it very clear in their ruling b4 the election that states controlled elections Thekaspervote Nov 2020 #10

yep and all the lawuits so far have had NO merit as NO OFFER of evidence that has held up to review beachbumbob Nov 2020 #11

Not sure about this IsItJustMe Nov 2020 #12